54. Jahrgang Nr. 6 / September 2024
Datenschutzerklärung | Zum Archiv | Suche




Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
Yo soy mi celda...


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2004
Widerstand? - Fehl(er)anzeige!


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Dezember 2004
Notstand: einbetoniert ... oder doch: Extra Ecclesiam salus est?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Misericordias Domini in aeternum cantabo - Autobiographie von Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc, Erzbischof von Hué, übersetzt von Elisabeth Meurer


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Bischofsweihen


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Fortsetzung II


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Fortsetzung III


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2004
Krönungseid des Papstes


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2004
Franz Nomista: Stellungnahme zur Frage: Welches ist die zentrale Häresie der sog. 'Konzils-Kirche?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2004
Papst Pius IX.: Syllabus


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2004
Magdalena S. Gmehling: Die Propheten laufen nie mit der Mehrheit. Zum 70. Todestag des christlichen Publizisten und Märtyrers Fritz Michael Gerlich


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Habemus Papam?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Anhang: Ratzingers Stellungnahme zu verschiedenen Themen


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Die Krise des Glaubens und der Verfall der röm.-kath. Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Eine kritische Analyse von Ratzingers Dominus Jesus


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
Reflections on 'The Passion of the Christ'


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
L’ERREUR FONDAMENTALE DE VATICAN II


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
CONSOLACIONES PARA LOS FIELES


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
¿Cual es la herejsi­a central de asi ­ llamada


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Open Letter to most Reverend Bishop M. Pivarunas


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Paganisation of the Liturgy in India


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Clothes Make the Person


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
La posizione teologica dell'Unione Sacerdotale Trento (nel Messico)


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL ERROR PRINCIPAL DEL VATICANO II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL HABITO HACE AL MONJE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Zur aktuellen Situation


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Zur theologischen Position von Kardinal Ratzinger


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Vom Elend der Postmoderne


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2005
Unfreundliche Betrachtungen


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
HABEMUS PAPAM?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
The Holy Trinity


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
Sobre la situación actual de la Iglesia


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A propos de la situation actuelle de l’Eglise


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A commentary on the present situation of the Church


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A Word from the Editor


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Auch eine Unverzeihliche - Hinweis auf Cristina Campo


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Brief an die Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografía de Monseñor P. M. Ngô-dinh-Thuc - Prologo


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia I


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia III


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia IV


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Apendice I - Autobiografia breve


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Apendice II - Documentos


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1971
Einige präzise Fragen an Herrn Professor Schmaus


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1971
Im Verborgenen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1971
WAHNSINN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2003
DAS ATHANASIANISCHE GLAUBENSBEKENNTNIS


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2003
Richtlinien für eine Papstwahl


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2003
Orthodoxie und europäische Identität


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
Über das Papsttum der Römischen Bischöfe


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
Die Bulle Cum ex apostolatus officio


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
Surrexit Christus, spes mea


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
The Roman Catholic Diaspora Church


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
La silla apostólica ocupada


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
Where do we stand?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
Über das Papsttum der Römischen Bischöfe


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2003
Zur derzeitigen Situation der Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
Auf der Suche nach dem Hauptirrtum des II. Vatikanums


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
Ein Mönch, der ein Buch geworden ist


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
Consoling meditations for the faithful


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
L’Eglise Catholique-Romaine de la diaspora


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
Sobre la situación actual de la Iglesia (esp.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A propos de la situation actuelle de l’Eglise (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A commentary on the present situation of the Church (engl.)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
MORTALIUM ANIMOS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
The Apostolic See Occupied


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Ou en sommes-nous?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Dalla „Lotta delle civiltà“ alla „Lotta delle idee“


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Yo soy mi celda...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1971
BRAND IM BASAR


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1971
Zur Frage der Gültigkeit der heiligen Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1971
BRIEF DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat März 2002
Zur Diskussion über die Des-Laurierssche These


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
Le Seigneur est ressuscité et il est apparu à Simon (fr/eng/spa)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
Alla ricerca dell’unità perduta


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
In Search of lost unity (engl/spa)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
CARTA PASTORAL SOBRE LA FAMILIA


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
Yo soy mi celda...


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
SOBRE EL PROBLEMA DE UNA POSIBLE ELECCION PAPAL


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juli 1971
WIDERSPRUCH


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juli 1971
DER KRÖNUNGSEID DES PAPSTES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juli 2002
William Shakespeare


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
DIE ROLLE DES FORTSCHRITTS IM KATASTROPHALEN NIEDERGANG


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Der Apostolische Stuhl


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat November 2002
Pfarrer Carl Sonnenschein


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Concerning the problem of the


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Autobiografia de su Em. Mons. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Is Mgr. Lefebvre a validly consecrated bishop?


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Le Siège apostolique < occupé >


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La sede apostolica


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
A Word from the Editor (engl./espan./fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat August 1971
Ehre dem Menschen


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat August 1971
GALILEO GALILEI


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 1971
DIE WISSENSCHAFT MONTINIS


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
Jesus Lord at thy birth/Nacimiento (Eng/Esp)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
LA IGLESIA CATOLICO-ROMANA EN LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
Dominus Jesus


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
ESSERE CRISTIANI SENZA CHIESA ?


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
A la recherche de l'unité perdue


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
COMMUNICATION DE LA REDACTION (fr./engl/espa/ital)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Offener Brief an H.H. P. Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Und das Wort ist Fleisch geworden


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 2001
Zur UNICEF


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
Bulle »Cum ex Apostolatus officio«


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
Anmerkungen zum Briefwechsel mit H.H. Pater Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Januar 2002
Die Synode von Pistoja


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2000
Über die Familie


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2000
Kurze Antwort auf eine Anfrage zum Sedisvakanzproblem


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2000
... und ich plädiere für die schwarzen Kutten


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2000
¿DONDE ESTAMOS?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
¿SER CRISTIANO SIN IGLESIA? - UNA PONENCIA-


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
DIE RÖMISCH-KATHOLISCHE DIASPORA-KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
Econe ante portas - notwendige Klarstellungen


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
IN MEMORIAM H.H. PFR. MOLITOR


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
¡VIVA CRISTO REY! -ESTACIONES DE UN VIAJE POR MÉJICO-


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
ESSERE CRISTIANI SENZA CHIESA ?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2000
Unser Heiland und König ist geboren! (dt/engl)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 2001
Dominus Iesus


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 2001
Lettera a cristiani preoccupati (ital)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 2001
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1971
DIE SCHWÄCHE DES KARDINAL ANTONIO BACCI


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1971
ZUM BRIEF EINES PFARRERS


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1999
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1999
DER GROSSE VERRAT AM PAPSTTUM


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
In memoriam H.H. Pfr. i.R. Werner Graus


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1971
ZUM BRIEF EINES LESERS


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1971
EIN AUFSCHLUSSREICHER HIRTENBRIEF


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1971
TUET BUSSE!


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Januar 1972
DAS LETZTE EVANGELIUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 1972
EIN IRRLEHRER: G.A. RONCALLI - JOHANNES XXIII.


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1972
LAIEN HELFEN DER KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1972
QUELLEN DER GLAUBENSLEHRE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1998
DER HL. DON BOSCO


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
ERKLÄRUNG S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NGÔ-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1997
WEIHEURKUNDE VON HERFORD


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2006
Der Protestantismus und seine ökumenische Aufwertung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1997
SIND DIE POST-KONZILIAREN WEIHERITEN GÜLTIG?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1997
SIND DIE POST-KONZILIAREN WEIHERITEN GÜLTIG?- Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1997
DAS UTRECHTER SCHISMA UND DER ALTKATHOLIZISMUS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1997
DIE RESTITUTION DER KIRCHE ALS RECHTSGEMEINSCHAFT, Anmerkungen


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1998
Man muß die Herzen für Christus erweitern


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1993
EIN FREIMAURER ALS BOTSCHAFTER BEIM 'VATIKAN'


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1993
EIN NEUES KLOSTER IN FRANKREICH


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1996
EIN SOLCHER RELIGIONSUNTERRICHT VERDIENT NICHT SEINEN NAMEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1996
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1996
Buchbesprechung: Die Unterminierung der (katholischen) Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1996
VERSINKT DER KATHOLISCHE WIDERSTAND IM SEKTIERERTUM?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1996
VERSINKT DER KATHOLISCHE WIDERSTAND... (Anmerkungen)


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1996
Gedanken über Formen heidnischer Antizipationen der Jungfrauengeburt


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1995
IN MEMORIAM...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1994
WARNING REGARDING A SUPPOSED BISHOP


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
La Santisima Trinidad


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1994
Sukzessionsliste von Jean Laborie


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1994
BOOK REVIEW


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1994
In memoriam


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1992
DIE RÖMISCH-KATHOLISCHE DIASPORA-KIRCHE - FIKTION ODER WIRKLICHKEIT? -


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1992
DIE RÖMISCH-KATHOLISCHE DIASPORA-KIRCHE - FIKTION ODER WIRKLICHKEIT? -


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1992
ARCHBISHOP NGO-DINH-THUC MARTYR FOR THE FAITH


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1992
Zum Problem der gegenwärtigen Vakanz des römischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Januar, Sondernr. 1993
ENTHÜLLUNG DES SYSTEMS DER WELTBÜRGER-REPUBLIK


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar-März 1993
ENTHÜLLUNG DES SYSTEMS DER WELTBÜRGER-REPUBLIK


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar-März 1993
Zum Problem der gegenwärtigen Vakanz des römischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1991
EINE ZEITUNG STELLT SICH VOR: FRAKTUR


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1991
ZUR AKTUELLEN SITUATION DER KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1991
ZUR ERNÜCHTERUNG DER GEMÜTER


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1991
AUFRUF AN ALLE KATHOLISCHEN CHRISTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
D E C L A R A T I O


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
IN MEMORIAM S.E. MGR. MOISÉS CARMONA RIVERA


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
DER MODERNE HOMINISMUS UND SEINE ABARTIGE RELIGIOSITÄT


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1990
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DES SAKRAMENTALEN PRIESTERTUMS DURCH DIE RÖMISCHE KONZILSKIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli, Sondernr 2/3 1990
§ 2. Die Gründung der Kirche als eines heiligen Reiches 'in dieser Welt'


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1990
ANMERKUNGEN ZUR THEOLOGIE VON H.H. P. GROSS


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1990
DER KAMPF GEGEN DIE HEILIGE MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1990
DIE BULLE CUM EX APOSTOLATUS OFFICIO VON PAPST PAUL IV.


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1990
ZWISCHEN ZWEI STÜHLEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat März 1991
DER HL. LAURENTIUS VON BRINDISI


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1991
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DES SAKRAMENTALEN PRIESTERTUMS DURCH DIE RÖMISCHE KONZILSKIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1991
KAPITEL III: DIE AKTUELLE VERWIRKLICHUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1991
KAPITEL IV: DIE FRAGE NACH DEM SOG. SPENDER


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1991
KAPITEL V: DIE STÄNDIGE ANGLEICHUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1989
DIE STELLUNG DER KIRCHE IM POLITISCHEN LEBEN DES RÖMERREICHES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1989
NEW AGE, Vorwort


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1989
NEW AGE, Ausführung II


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1989
ZUR PROBLEMATIK DER RESTITUTION DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1989
DIE ENTWICKLUNG DER KIRCHLICHEN VERFASSUNG BIS ZUM 5. JAHRHUNDERT


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1990
AUF DEM WEG ZUR WELTEINHEITSRELIGION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1990
UBI PETRUS - IBI ECCLESIA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1990
ZUR PROBLEMATIK DER RESTITUTION DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1990
BISCHÖFLICHE ERKLÄRUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Januar 1989
DIE KRISE DES GLAUBENS UND DER VERFALL DER RÖM.-KATH. KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1988
BRIEF VON S.E. BISCHOF CARMONA AN EINEN MODERNISTISCHEN PRIESTER


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1988
DIE ZWIELICHTIGKEIT DER GESTALT JOHANNES XXIII., Fortsetz.


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1988
ZUR PERSON VON MGR. MARCEL LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1988
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat März 1989
GEHÖRTEN RONCALLI UND MONTINI DER LOGE AN?


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN, Fortsetz


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1987
Über die christliche Taufe und das Tauf-Sakrament


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1987
STELLUNGNAHME ZU DEM ARTIKEL DIE KRISE DER APOSTOLISCHEN SUKZESSION...


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1987
KOMMENTAR ZU DEM DOKUMENT 'DIALOG UND MISSION'


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1987
DIE PARUSIE, IV. Kap


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1987
DIE PARUSIE, V. Kap


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1987
DIE PARUSIE, IX. Kap


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1987
DIE PARUSIE, X. Kap und Anhang


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat März 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat März 1988
NEW AGE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat März 1988
WARUM DER STANDPUNKT DER PRIESTERBRUDERSCHAFT ST. PIUS X. VON MGR. LEFEBVRE VERWORFEN WERDEN MUSS


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1986
DER WIEDERAUFBAU DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1986
UNTERWEGS ZUR WELTEINHEITSRELIGION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1986
ZUM TODE VON HERRN DR. HUGO MARIA KELLNER


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1986
... DEN LEIB DES HERRN NICHT MEHR UNTERSCHEIDEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1986
REV.FR. MCKENNA ZUM BISCHOF GEWEIHT


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Januar 1987
ZUM 'MYSTERIUM FIDEI'


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1985
WIEDERVEREINIGUNGSVERSUCHE BIS ZUM PONTIFIKAT PIUS XII.


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1985
SEELSORGE IN MEXIKO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1985
Es WÄRE ZU BEDENKEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1985
BRIEF VON HERRN PROF. DR. D. WENDLAND AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/März 1986
DER WIEDERAUFBAU DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/März 1986
KRÖNUNGSEID DES PAPSTES


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/März 1986
AN IHREN FRÜCHTEN WERDET IHR SIE ERKENNEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/März 1986
DIE KOMMUNION ALS OPFERMAHL


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juli 2006
Armenische Passion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1984
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DER HL, MESSE IM SOG. 'N.O.M.'


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2013
Die Irrtümer des II. Vatikanums und ihre Überwindung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1984
ZUR BISCHOFSWEIHE VON MGR. GÜNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1984
DER GESALBTE ANTICHRIST


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1985
EINE HÄRETISCHE 'ERKLÄRUNG'


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1985
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DER HL. MESSE IM SOG. 'N.O.M.'


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2006
The Autobiography of Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc - Misericordias Domini in aeternum cantabo


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2006
The Autobiography of Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc - Part 2


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2006
The Autobiography of Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc - Part 3


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2006
The Autobiography of Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc - Part 4


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
Die Ereignisse der beiden letzten Jahre


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
EIN BRIEF VON BISCHOF MOISES CARMONA


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
DIE MACHT HINTER ECONES THRON


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
Die Wojtylanische Diktatur


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
IST MAN SCHISMATIKER, WENN MAN DEN STUHL DES HEILIGEN PETRUS .... FÜR UNBESETZT ... HÄLT


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
NOCH EINMAL: ZUM PROBLEM DES 'UNA CUM' IM 'TE IGITUR' DER HL. MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
WIDER DIE PROPHEZEIHUNGEN DES SOG. ROMAN CATHOLIC


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
BRIEF VON H.H. P. BARBARA AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
Die Wojtylanische Diktatur


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
HELDEN MIT AUSZEICHNUNG UNERWÜNSCHT


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
AUTORITÄT UND SEDISVAKANZ


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1984
BERICHT AUS BRÜSSEL


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1984
FRONTWECHSEL


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1984
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DER HL. MESSE IM SOG. 'N.O.M.'


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 1984
Eine Erklärung von Mgr. M.L. Guérard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 1984
DIE KIRCHE DER LETZTEN TAGE


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 1984
REFLEXIONEN UND MOMENTE EINER KRITISCHEN ANALYSE


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat März 1984
DIE ZERSTÖRUNG DER HL. MESSE IM SOG. 'N.O.M.'


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
BRIEF AN S.E. MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NGÔ-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
M. LEFEBVRE IN MEXIKO


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
T E S T I F I C A T I O


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
BISCHOFSWEIHE S.E. MGR. BENIGNO BRAVO UND MGR. ROBERTO MARTINEZ


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
ERZBISCHOF PETER MARTIN NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
MGR. LEFEBVRE CONTRA MGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Oktober 1982
OFFENER BRIEF AN DIE ... KULTURGEMEINSCHAFT ST. PLUS X. E.V.


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1982
EIN BRIEF VON BISCHOF MOISES CARMONA


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1982
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1982
Epistola


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1982
Declaration concernant Palmar


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1982
BISCHOFSWEIHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1981
SEQUENZ ZUM HL. FRONLEICHNAMSFEST


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1981
TRADITIONALISTISCHER PROTESTANTISMUS


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1981
BRIEFAUSZUG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1981
ZUM PROBLEM DES UNA CUM


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1981
DIE FALSCHE ÖKUMENE DES MODERNISTISCHEN ROM


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1981
DER HL. RABANUS MAURUS


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1981
ZU EINER VERLAUTBARUNG VON MONSEIGNEUR LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
KURZE BESCHREIBUNG DES TRADITIONALISMUS IN MEXIKO


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
PREDIGT VOM 4. OKTOBER 1981


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
STELLUNGNAHME ZU DEM STANDPUNKT VON MGR. MARCEL LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
PRÄZISE ZIELE!


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
SECTE ORTHODOXE?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
DER GREUEL DER VERWÜSTUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
QU'EST-CE À DIRE: LA NOUVELLE MESSE PEUT TRE VALIDE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
LETTRES


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
CAHIERS de CASSICIACUM


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1980
CHRISTUS NOVUM INSTITUIT PASCHA...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1980
ANTWORT VON H.H. PFARRER HANS MILCH


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1980
RALLIONS-NOUS : L'EXEMPLE VIENT D'EN-HAUT


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
DIE KATZE LÄSST DAS MAUSEN NICHT.


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
RÜCKGABE VON MENSCH UND WELT


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
CHRISTUS NOVUM INSTITUIT PASCHA...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
CHRISTUS NOVUM INSTITUIT PASCHA... Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
REPONSE DE HR L'ABBE HANS MILCH AUX QUESTIONS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1980
KOEXISTENZ DER VOR- UND NACHKONZILIAREN RITEN?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1980
RIEN QUE L'ANCIENNE MESSE -THE OLD MASS ONLY fr/eng


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1981
DER NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: EINE GEGEN-MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1981
QUE SIGNIFIE LA COEXISTENCE DES RITES PRE- ET POSTCONCILIAIRES


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
Protestation de Foi Catholique - franz/deutsch


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
A CO-EXISTANCE OF THE PRE- AND POSTCONCILIAR RITES


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2006
Präzise Ziele!


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1979
MGR. LEFEBVRES BRIEF AN MGR. WOJTYLA MIT EINER STELLUNGNAHME DES H.H. GUÉRARD DES LAURIERS


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1979
BRIEF AN MGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1979
BRIEF DES PRÄSIDENTEN DER ASSOCIATION ST. PIE V AN MGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1979
NOCH EINMAL: PRÄZISE FRAGEN AN ECONE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
LETTRE OUVERTE À SON EXCELLENCE MGR. MARCEL LEFéBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
Enzyklika »Casti connubii«


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
OFFENER BRIEF AN HERRN PROF.DR. HEINZ KREMERS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
WIR STOLZE MENSCHENKINDER ...


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1980
BRIEF VON PATER DES LAURIERS AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1980
WIEDER EINMAL DER 'NOM'


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1980
OFFENER BRIEF AN S. EXCELLENZ MGR. MARCEL LEFÈBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1980
KATECHISMUS DER KATHOLISCHEN RELIGION


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1980
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
Konzil von Trient: Dekret über das Sakrament der Eucharistie - ERLÖSUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
CONTRA MURMURANTES


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1978
EIN INTERESSANTES DOKUMENT


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1978
GEDANKEN ZUM HEUTIGEN PRIESTERMANGEL


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Oktober 1978
ÄRGERNIS VOR GOTT UND DEN MENSCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1978
RECHTGLÄUBIGE SEKTE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1978
DIE KIRCHE ALS DIE WAHRE INSTITUTION DES HEILS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1978
DER STUHL PETRI IST WEITERHIN VAKANT


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1978
SIE LÜGEN, PATER WERENFRIED


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1978
BRIEF VON KARDINAL BOURNE AUS DEM JAHRE 1928


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1979
DIE HL. MESSE IST KEINE BLOSSE DISZIPLINARSACHE!


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1979
VERE ANTIQUI ERRORIS NOVI REPARATORES!


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1979
HÄRESIE VOR DEM AMTSANTRITT


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1977
SIND WIR VORBEREITET ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1977
DIE LITURGISCHE SPRACHE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1977
Konzil von Trient: Dekret über das Meßopfer


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1977
DIE DOGMATISCHEN BESTIMMUNGEN DES TRIDENTINUMS ZUR PRIESTERWEIHE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1977
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE VOR HUNDERT JAHREN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1978
DIE ABSICHTEN UND DAS ZIEL DES BENEDIKTINERS ODO CASEL


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1978
GEGENWART DER KIRCHE IN DER WELT


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1978
DIE LITRUGISCHE SPRACHE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
EN LA ENCRUCIJADA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
À la croisée des chemins


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
At the crossroads


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
Y seréis como Dios (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
And thou wilt be like God (Gen. 3,5)


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1976
LITERATURHINWEIS


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1976
DIE FEIER DER KINDERTAUFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1976
DER KRÖNUNGSEID DES PAPSTES


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1976
AKTIVE TEILNAHME


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1976
NEUERE BEITRÄGE ZUM GESCHEHEN UM ECONE


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1976
STELLUNGNAHME ZUM INTERVIEW KARL RAHNERS


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1976
MEIN VOLK, GEDENKE DOCH! (Mich. 6,5)


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1976
DIE LETZTE ÖLUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1977
AKTIVE TEILNAHME


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1977
AKTIVE TEILNAHME


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 1er continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 4. continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 5. continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
APPENDICE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1975
ADAM, WO BIST DU!


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1975
LISTE DER EINWÄNDE GEGEN DEN NOVUS ORDO MISSAE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1975
BEITRÄGE ZUM GESCHEHEN UM ECÔNE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1975
Beata nobis gaudia


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1975
Sie glauben noch an ein Paradies?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1975
ADAM, WO BIST DU!


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1975
LISTE DER EINWÄNDE GEGEN DEN NOVUS ORDO MISSAE


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1975
DAS NEUE 'MISSALE ROMANUM'


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1975
FRAU, SIEHE, DEIN SOHN!


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1975
BEITRÄGE ZUM GESCHEHEN UM ECÔNE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1975
EIN KIND IST UNS GEBOREN - EIN SOHN IST UNS GESCHENKT


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1975
FRAU, SIEHE, DEIN SOHN!


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1975
DIE BESTIMMUNGEN DES TRIDENTINUMS ZUR HL. MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1975
LESERBRIEFE IN AUSZÜGEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1976
EMPFEHLUNGEN, WIE SICH DIE GLÄUBIGEN IN DER JETZIGEN NOTLAGE DER KIRCHE VERHALTEN SOLLTEN.


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1976
AKTIVE TEILNAHME


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1974
GÜLTIGE UND WIRKSAME MATERIE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1974
GÜLTIGE UND WIRKSAME MATERIE - II.


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1974
DIE NEUE RELIGION


Ausgabe Nr. 78 Monat Oktober/Nov. 1974
GÜLTIGE FORM


Ausgabe Nr. 78 Monat Oktober/Nov. 1974
SIND DIE NEUEN HOCHGEBETE ANNEHMBAR?


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1974
CORNELIUS UND CYPRIAN


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1974
DER ANFANG DER TÄUSCHUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1974
DER UNSICHTBARE OPFERER-PRIESTER


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1974
ANTWORT


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Jan./Februar-dopp. Nr. 1975
DIE GETREUE INTENTION


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1975
DIE EHEZWECKE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1975
DIE UNGÜLTIGKEIT DER NEUEN MESSE VON ANFANG AN, Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2007
DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1972
WURZEL, STAMM UND KRONE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1972
HÄRESIE VOR DEM AMTSANTRITT


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1972
DIE LEONINISCHEN GEBETE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1972
Wurzel, Stamm und Krone


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1972
Kurze Zusammenfassung der Argumente für das 'für viele'


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1972
Wurzel, Stamm und Krone


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1972
Die Messe des hl. Pius V. ist immer noch erlaubt


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Januar 1973
Offener Brief an die guten Priester


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 1973
DIE HOCHZEIT ZU KANA


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1973
Wurzel, Stamm und Krone


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1973
BRIEF DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1973
Das Geburtsjahr Christi und die Schätzung des Quirinus


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Januar 1974
Die gültige Materie, das Offertorium, Ich


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 1974
Zum Tode von Bischof Blasius Sigebald Kurz OFM


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1974
Papa haereticus


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 1974
Wollt auch ihr weggehen?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1973
DER VERLORENE SOHN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1973
Tuet Buße!


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1973
DER HL. BONIFATIUS - ZUM FEST AM 5. JUNI


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1973
VERÄNDERUNGEN IM MISSALE


Ausgabe Nr. 45 Monat Juli/August 1973
THEOLOGISCHE UND JURISTISCHE BEDEUTUNG DER BULLE QUO PRIMUM


Ausgabe Nr. 45 Monat Juli/August 1973
Wurzel, Stamm und Krone


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 1973
VORLÄUFER, NACHLÄUFER, MITLÄUFER


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 1973
VOLKSSPRACHE IN DER LITURGIE?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 1973
Gehorcht!


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1973
Darf ein Papst den Ritus ändern?


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1973
Die heilige Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2007
Enzyklika Casti connubii - Anmerkungen


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Carta a Su Eminencia el obispo XXX


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Letter to His Excellency xxxx


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
LA SANTISIMA TRINIDAD


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Et vous serez comme Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaratio


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaración


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Dichiarazione


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Das freimaurerische Prinzip


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum von Benedikt XVI.vom 7. Juli 2007


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Die Falle der Motu-Proprio-Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Février 1982
COEXISTENCE PACIFIQUE?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Février 1982
‘RIEN QUE L'ANCIENNE MESSE‘ - EXEGESE D' UN SLOGAN


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE OLD MASS ONLY


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
CATHOLIC RESISTANCE AGAINST MODERNISM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
Is Mgr. Lefebvre a validly consecrated bishop?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
ANOINTED ANTICHRISTS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
LE TEMPS DE L'APOCALYPSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
THE LATTER DAY CHURCH


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
Paganisation of the Liturgy in India


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
SERPENTS OINTS PAR LE SAINT ESPRIT


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
DECLARAT ION OF MGR. M.L. GUÉRARD DES LAURIERS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
SACRE DE M. L'ABBE GÜNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
QUE PENSER DE LA MISE AU POINT DE M. ALPHONSE EISELE?


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
LIFE IN APOCALYPTICAL TIME


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
IMPUDENT!


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
L'ÉGLISE DES DERNIERS TEMPS


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
¡ NAVIDAD! ¡ NAVIDAD!


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
LE CAS DU PAPE HONORIUS (625-638)


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
LA TETE EST NECESSAIRE


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
DE ECCLESIAE CAPITE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ITE, MISSA EST


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ONCE MORE: PRECISE QUESTIONS TO ECÔNE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
FOR ALL AND FOR YOU - THE PROGRAMME OF JOHN PAUL II.


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
A PROCLAMATION ON 'THE NEW MASS AND THE POPE'


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Februar 1981
NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: AN ANTI-MASS. Part 1


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Februar 1981
NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: AN ANTI-MASS, Part 2


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1981
VATICANUM 2 NEW RITES - ARE THEY VALID?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
Das Motu Proprio – nüchtern betrachtet


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
EXTRAIT DE LETTRE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LE CANON 188, N° 4 OU: OU EST L'EGLISE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
UN COMMUNIQUE DE MONSEIGNEUR LEFÈBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
EXTRAIT DE LA BULLE DE PAUL IV: CUM EX APOSTOLATUS OFFICIO


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LETTRE A MSGR. LEFÈBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Juni 1985
LES PRISES D'ARNAUD LE DOUANIER


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Juni 1985
A CUSTOMS-OFFICER'S PRIZE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Juni 1985
L'ANTI-CHRIST ET L'ÉGLISE OFFICIELLE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
MONTRE-MOI TES CHEMINS, SEIGNEUR


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
OUR LADY OF FATIMA AND THE HOLY FATHER


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
DE APOSTOLICA SEDE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
HOW THE ROMAN CITADEL COLLAPSED


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
Pastoral-Brief/Epistola pastoralis/LETTRE PASTORALE-dt/lat/fr


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
CATHOLIQUES CONTRE IMPOSTEURS


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
Where do we stand?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
Ou en sommes-nous?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
JUAN PABLO II. NO ES UN PAPA CATOLICO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOPS SPEAK


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
VATICAN II FACE À LA TRADITION


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
REPONSE DE M. L'ABBÉ MILCH A LA LETTRE OUVERTE DU M. HELLER


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
FALSE BISHOPS AND TRUE BISHOPS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
EST-ON SCHISMATIQUE SI ON JUGE QUE LE SIEGE DE SAINT PIERRE EST ACTUELLEMENT OCCUPE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
IS ONE A SCHISMATIC, WHEN IN OUR DAYS ONE CONSIDERS THE CHAIR OF ST. PETER AS VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY' OF THE SO-CALLED 'ROMAN CATHOLIC'


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
THE ARIANISM - AN EXAMPLE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE CONSENSUS FIDELIUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
CONTRARIES PAR LA CONSECRATION D'ÉVÊQUES CATHOLIQUES


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
LETTRE OUVERTE D'AMERIQUE AUX FRERES DANS LA FOI


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
Concerning the problem of the 'una cum'


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
LE NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: UNE ANTI-MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
SEULEMENT, QUAND LE FILS DE L'HOMME REVIENDRA TROUVERA-TIL LA FOI SUR LA TERRE?


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Oktober 1981
LETTRE OUVERTE A MGR. MARCEL LEFEÈBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Oktober 1981
LA BANDE DES QUATRE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
Beilage II zu EINSICHT X(2) Juni 1980: Die neue Messe und der Papst


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
APPEL DU 16.4.1979


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
Vox FIDEl: LA VOIX DE LA FOl OU L'ORGANE DES SOUHAITS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat February 2008
ARE POST CONCILIAR RITES VALID?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat February 2008
THE NEW RITE OF BAPTISM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat February 2008
THE NEW RITE OF BAPTISM - PART II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat February 2008
LETTER FROM A PRIEST


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
LETTRE DE L'EVEQUE MEXICAIN MOISES CARMONA


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE OF MGR. LOUIS VEZELIS O.F.M. (engl.)


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
ALGUNAS CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LAS CONSAGRACIONES EPISCOPALES


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
STORM CLOUDS OVER THE WHOLE WORLD


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
BREVE RESEÑA SOBRE EL TRADICIONALISMO EN MEXICO


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
SECTE ORTHODOXE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
HOMELIE DU 4 OCTOBRE 1981


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
A ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP SPEAKS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
JURAMENTO DE CONSERVAR Y PRESERVAR LA UNIDAD DE LA IGLESIA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE DEL R.P. JOSE DE JESUS ROBERTO MARTINEZ Y GUTIERREZ


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
LE CAS BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE CASE BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
ANSWER OF REVEREND FATHER HANS MILCH


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
ANTICHRIST


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE QUESTION OF THE PAPACY TODAY


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
Die Bulle >Cum ex apostolatus officio< von Papst Paul IV.


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
I believe in the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
A PAPAL ELECTION UNDER THE PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
DECLARATION: On John Paul II's death


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
Apostasía y Confusión


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
LA BULA DE PAULO IV


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
Pauls' IV. Bulle Cum ex apostolatus officio - Appendix


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
LA VALIDEZ CE LOS RITOS POSTCONCILIARES CUESTIONADA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
BIBLIOGRAFIA: VALIDEZ CUESTIONADA DE LOS NUEVOS RITOS POSTCONCILIARES


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS - CONTIN. 1


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS - CONTIN. 2


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
ENSEIGNEMENT DE PIE XII POUR DÉFENDRE LES ÉCRITURES


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PROCLAMATION CONCILIAIRE CONCERNANT LA LIBERTÉ RELIGIEUSE


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 1.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 2.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL TEMA DE LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA - BIBLIOGRAFIA


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2008
REPLICA AL ARTICULO 'APOSTASIA Y CONFUSION'


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
DICTAMEN SOBRE UNA ELECION PAPAL EN LAS PRESENTES CIRCUNSTANCIAS


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
ELIGENDUS EST PAPA


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2009
Die Holocaust-Latte liegt zu hoch!


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2009
Dokumente zum Fall Williamson


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
The Holocaust Bar is too High


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
SATIS COGNITUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Documents about the Case Williamson


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Sedevacantists Believe in the Holy Roman Catholic Church‏


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2009
Von der wahren Kirche Christi


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Aeterni Patris, engl


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Aeterni Patris, span


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Le bon sens catholique


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA NATIVIDAD DE NUESTRO SEÑOR


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2009
Die Göttlichkeit des Christentums


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Christmas Letter 2009


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Humani Generis


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Festividad de Cristo Rey


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
St. Leo the Great


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
L’EGLISE CATHOLIQUE-ROMAINE DE LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Estado de emergencia: afianzado en cemento


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat giugno 2010
Consolazioni per i fedeli


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat giugno 2010
Al crocevia


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat giugno 2010
Novena To The Holy Ghost


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat luglio 2010
Auctorem fidei - III


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat luglio 2010
Auctorem fidei - IV


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2010
Die Synode von Pistoia und ihre Verurteilung durch Pius VI.


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2010
Breve Pius’ VI. an den Bischof von Chiusi und Pienza


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 8. c-d Der wahre Kern der ‚Intentionsfrage’:


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat März 2011
B. 10. a - 11. Aber ist die an den gesamten Klerus der Rest-Kirche gerichtete Forderung


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
Clerical Abuse


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
E sarete come Dio (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
A proposito della situazione attuale della Chiesa


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
Al crocevia


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
SOBRE LA REALIDAD Y LA EXITENCIA DEL PURGATORIO


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2011
Vom klerikalen Mißbrauch in traditionalistischen Kreisen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2011
Ein Besuch bei Fr. Krier in Las Vegas/USA


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2011
Der Wiederaufbau der Kirche als Institution


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2012
Brief an Herrn Gilbert Grisé


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2012
Verwechslung mit Folgen


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
Erneut auf dem Prüfstand


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2012
Hart, aber fair - ein Briefwechsel zur aktuellen kirchlichen Situation


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat März 2013
Die Verhandlung vor dem Synedrium


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat März 2013
Null und nichtig – der Ritus der Bischofsweihe von 1968


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Habemus Papam? Zur Wahl von Jorge Mario Bergoglio


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Null und nichtig – der Ritus der Bischofsweihe von 1968


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2013
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2014
Das erzieherische Wirken der Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2015
Leserbrief zu: „Gehört der Islam zu Deutschland?“


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2015
Islamisches Recht (šarī‘a) – mit dem Grundgesetz vereinbar?(1)


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2015
Die Irrtümer des II. Vatikanums und ihre Überwindung durch die Erkenntnis Christi als Sohn Gottes


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2016
„Er sah ihn und ging vorüber“ – Priester ohne kirchliche Sendung: das Legitimitätsproblem


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2016
„Er sah ihn und ging vorüber“ – Priester ohne kirchliche Sendung: das Legitimitätsproblem


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2016
Et regnabunt cum Christo mille annis


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 2016
Et regnabunt cum Christo mille annis


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2017
Et regnabunt cum Christo mille annis


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2017
Et regnabunt cum Christo mille annis


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2018
Arianer, Nicäaner, Modernisten, Lefebvristen, Sedisprivationisten, Sedisvakantisten, Nonkonformisten und Schlafmützen: Maran atha! - Komm Herr!


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2018
Leserbriefe


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 2018
Die Auserwählung Marias


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2019
Mitstreiter gesucht – Brief an einen Konservativen


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2019
Weihnachten 2019


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2020
Papa contra Papam


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2020
... mit leeren Händen um Kopf und Kragen


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Errors of Vatican II and their defeat through Recognizing Christ as Son of God


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
Is Jesus Christ the Son of God?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Question remains: Is Jesus Christ the Son of God?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Los errores del Vaticano II y su superación gracias al conocimiento de Cristo como Hijo de Dios


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
¿Es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Cómo se puede conocer a Cristo como Hijo de Dios: nuevas consideraciones


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Queda por responder la pregunta «¿es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?»


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
«Bienaventurados los puros de corazón porque ellos verán a Dios» (Mt 5,8).


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
«Por eso, todos nosotros, ya sin el velo que nos cubría la cara, somos como un espejo que refleja la gloria del Señor;


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Jésus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Les erreurs de Vatican II


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Juli 2020
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2021
Auf dem langsamen Marsch in die Apostasie deutsch englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2021
Das Turiner Grabtuch – ein Beweis für die Existenz Jesu? Teil I


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2021
Hyopstatische Union - Teil 2


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat November 2021
Leben und Werk des hochw. Abbé. Augustin Barruel


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
October 9th, 2012 – an Oppressing Anniversary


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2023
Clerici vagantes oder Priester der kath. Kirche – ein perpetum mobile ? der Fall Ramolla -


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2023
Über die Ewigkeit


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
The 2000 Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
En busca de la unidad perdida


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Llamamiento a la unidad de la Iglesia


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Nota sobre la Declaración del año 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Declaratión del año 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2024
Aspicite nobis illusiones - Prophezeit uns Illusionen!


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2024
„Papa haereticus“ – eine Antwort auf H.H. Viganò


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2024
Aspicite nobis illusiones englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat März 2024
„Papa haereticus“ –englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
Meine Begegnung mit S.E. Erzbischof Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
My Time with His Excellency, Archbishop Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
Ma rencontre avec S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
Mi encuentro con Su Excelentísimo y Reverendísimo Arzobispo Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
Il mio incontro con S.E. l´Arcivescovo Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat März 2024
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
Darf der Papst den Ritus der Karwoche ändern?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
Can the Pope Change the Rite of Holy Week?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 2024
Katholiken in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat September 2024
USA


The Roman Catholic Diaspora Church
 
The Roman Catholic Diaspora Church –
Fact or Fiction ?


by
Prof. Dr. Diether Wendland
translated by Emilia Vaiciulis

A SHORT HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1)

Shortly after his election, John XXIII announced that an “œcumenical Council” would be convened, supposedly inspired by a very special “illumination” of the ‘Holy Ghost’. He then began taking steps to implement this Council. But manifestly none of the ‘Council Fathers’ hurrying to Rome were aware that this supposed ‘Pope’ was a blatant heretic (…) In fact, when an œcumenical Council is convened by a Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, it has the ‘assistentia divina’, i.e. the help or support of the Hoy Ghost in all discussions and decisions in matters of faith and morals (…) Freely and without any contradictions did all bishops respond to the call of a flagrant heretic for this council. And they willingly submitted themselves to his ‘authority’. What an edifying sight! Such a phenomenon had never before occurred in the Catholic Church.

We shall quote a statement of Cardinal Döpfner, President of the German Bishops’ Conference, in order to highlight the erroneous ideas on Roncalli held by the bishops: “with many others I confidently hope to see the day when we shall be allowed to venerate Pope John as a saint of the Church.” In a radio talk-show, Döpfner explained that in no way was Roncalli’s intention to touch dogmas or any basic principles of the Church in the slightest way. Because of his rustic origins, which he himself often referred to, he admitted that even in minor things he had great sense for values of the past.

With such talk, the uneasiness here and there of the conservative faithful was calmed down (…) But most Catholics, both clergy and laymen believed, i.e. they considered even such flagrant lies as the truth. No public protests were to be noticed anywhere, let alone big demonstrations against such monstrosities (apart from a later demonstration with placards by the “Una Voce, Gruppe Maria” one in Munich, in which Döpfner himself was publicly exposed as a heretic, together with other ones from the authorities). But a sustained bombardment of heresies lasting over 10 years from the ‘hierarchy’ could not fail to have its effect. Heresies however are the gates of hell because lack of eternal salvation is their direct consequence! (…)

RONCALLI AND HIS ‘ILLUMINATED COUNCIL’

There were also only a few – surprisingly few – who soon after the start of this so-called “Pastoral Council”, which implicated itself with the impure ‘spirit of the world’ recognized the horrible fact that Christ, the Head of the Church, had withdrawn His divine assistance from a general Council. Numerous clear indications of this existed. But why? In order to show Catholics that the bishops of the Church, as a whole in these times, did not amount to anything much. However for many it was a grace, as far as their knowledge of the Faith went, and a gift of Christ, who, provided they were of good will, would help them put aside their blind faith and trust in their bishops, which had been instilled into them by their education. The element lacking in blind trust and faith (in the bishops) is, intellectual insight and critical-rational thinking. For this reason one was justified in referring to this phenomenon as the widely disseminated “catholic sickness” which got to epidemic proportions. Later this grave sickness became mortal-in the religious sense. However, when the supernatural life coming from God’s grace alone is extinguished, one has no way of detecting this except by the spi-ritual effects on human nature. Nobody, not even the most pious person can be assured of definitively possessing supernatural grace until his death. That is why St. Paul teaches that each one must work out his salvation “ in fear and trembling”. (Phil 2, 12).

When a general Council falls into heresy or generates it, this does not mean that it becomes a pseu-do-council or it never was a council, but that all the ‘catholic bishops’ and their satellites participating as the pillars of this council had already become heretics and had apostasied from the Roman Catholic Church. Besides, in three years this apostasy had given rise to that monstrous structure the “roman conciliar church”, not just in Rome but in dioceses world-wide. Its first Head was Roncalli: he accepted to be crowned with the Tiara to be universally seen by the faithful and not just by Catholics who were in Rome itself, in order to win their approval. The TV and radio also co-operated in widely diffusing this.

If one wishes to come to terms with the disastrous state of the affairs in the Church, (or with the coup d’état in a State) – one must strive to consider its real origins, to go back to what the principal cause was, for without that it would be impossible to grasp where it would all lead to in the long run. If the ‘2d Vatican Council’ had not taken place, all attention would have been riveted exclusively on Roncalli and his henchmen. But the rumpus surrounding the ‘ reformative council’ deflected many from this consideration. “No reasonable person could be against reforms”! was the slogan of the day. Even Catholics, remaining fast to traditions would hardly appreciate their brothers in the Faith accusing them of being idiotic retrogrades because they ‘didn’t recognize the signs of the times’, because’ they were old-fashioned’ (…)

At the time, whether it was through sheer ignorance or only partial understanding of the situation, many confused the visible heretical world-wide bishops’ corps with the “little flock of Christ” (in the biblical sense). The fact is, that this flock had ceased to be visible, whether in its totality or in its parts. 2) But at least the question was being asked: “What’s doing in the Roman Catholic Church?” And above all, “what’s this upheaval in the Church?” For everything was being overturned and questioned. And this was an ongoing process. Who was behind this? It was the Clergy, because the lay-people had nothing to say, and besides, they were far too passive as whole to take any initiative themselves. They were content with the status quo and to just accept the Faith handed down to them by their forbears. This sterile attitude continues to this very day.(..)

HOW THE CONCEPT OF APOSTOLICITY WAS REFUSED AND DESTROYED

Hardly was Pius XII, the last pope to date, and hated by a great number, dead and buried (by whose side (oh horrible thought!) Roncalli was later interred!- then almost everywhere in the Catholic Church strange people appeared, above all false mystics (almost exclusively characterized by a naïve marial devotion) and commonly called persons benefiting from special ‘illuminative graces’, false prophets and charismatics, but also reformers of the liturgy, even ‘catholic’ theologians who openly questioned dogmas, or who claimed that these dogmas were out-of-date! There was no end to all of these evils darkening the image of the Catholic Church and springing up everywhere. They were even perceived by non - catholics, but not always with a malicious joy. Sometimes even with sadness! What then was the origin of all these evils? Certain people think that the vacancy of the Apostolic See which had then begun and which continues on to this day was surely the underlying cause. But that could not be right! Such a vacancy doesn’t prevent the Holy Ghost working in the Church, apart from the fact that the Holy Ghost, Who has already been sent for some time now, ‘breathes, where It will’ and not where some would have it breathe…

Therefore one can conclude that the cause was not necessarily outside of the Church, but in the Catholic Church itself. It was in fact heresies, and heresies alone which were the cause of this type of evil in the Church! They were actively perpetrated throughout its whole social structure! One advantage of this vacancy at least, was that it served to help expose these heresies springing up every where. That is why one must not only judge this vacancy negatively, but one must try to understand its significance. Because nothing happens without the permission of God, Who, after all knows well why He allows certain physical or moral ills to happen. Only those who either didn’t recognize that sede-vacantism has been a permanent state of affairs since Roncalli till the present time, who didn’t understand its meaning, divided themselves later into two dialectic camps – the well-known traditionalist- progressivist one, or the old-conservatives – neo-modernists, without realizing that in fact they were already part of the ‘conciliar church’ which had integrated them. (…)

Upon considering the imminent ‘reformative Council’, “(…) (it must be noted that it could not be the second Vatican Council because it had been convened by a heretic). All those who apprehensively watched this world spiritual reunion were confronted with the following oppressive question: how many effective members of the Catholic Church, whether clerics or lay-people, would be found to have faithfully and loyally remained in the apostolic Roman Catholic Church at the end of the ‘coun-cil’, in order to take possession of its heritage and to transmit its veritable doctrine?
For all the agitators who for a long time had been jockeying for a general Reform Council (weren’t their spokesmen always be seen on television with reports on the Council?) were bent on radically breaking with the apostolicity of the Roman Catholic Church. Therein lay the significance of their motto “reconsider everything” or “intrepidly set your sights on completely new horizons”. The same direction was also indicated by the ‘signs of the times’. Later it was said, and it was only logical: “ there is now no return to the time before the Council”, precisely because this council had triggered off a radical new orientation for the Church!

The average catholic, whether layman or religious, was impressed by this slogan and even considered it quite reasonable. Furthermore, these radical reformers were very conscious of the undeniable fact that the majority of Catholics had lost all sense of the apostolicity of the Church, or else had very vague notions about it; to such an extent that they were not able to recognize as hypocrisy when on Sundays at the Mass the reformers openly professed “Credo in …apostolicam Ecclesiam”. Some knew quite well that they lied like hypocrites, whilst others were not aware of this. Both parties, however, were present at Masses celebrated “una cum Roncalli…! “ 3)

EN ROUTE TO THE DIASPORA

The attempt to destroy the apostolicity of the Catholic Church was only possible by means of a general Council. And this , on the basis of Vatican I, which excluded the possibility of there being a schism without a heresy. The blood of the martyrs Sts. Peter and Paul was already crying out for vengeance from heaven, but the general council would necessarily push the Church to the outskirts of society and finally drive it underground- so much so that it finally became a “Church of the diaspora”. One could even call it the Roman Catholic Church of the diaspora. The sorrowful diaspora-situation of the Roman Catholic Church was more or less obvious after the “ solemn closing” ceremony in Oct. 1965 (and the date of its first session), when there could no longer be any doubt that all the ‘bishops’ places were occupied by heresiarchs. These began to “pasture” their flocks- the catholic faithful- in a “new spirit”. In this they were aided by the clergy - i.e. the clerics submitted to them, - in order to incorporate as many Catholics as possible into the summary “conciliar church” (…) Only the ‘living’ (as opposed to ‘dead’) members of the Roman Catholic Church-diaspora did not lose their christocentric perspective. They were equally conscious that a Church in diaspora did not lose its apostolicity at all. (This point was a worry for some). In this respect, it could only be prejudiced, albeit rather severely.

This is why the following question must be asked, which it will be hardly easy to answer: to what extend could its apostolicity be prejudiced ? In fact, the apostolicity of the Church is indestructible. The Church was founded not just by any man, but by Jesus Christ, who built it on “ the foundation of the apostles and prophets”, as St. Paul teaches (Eph. 2,20). All ‘living’ members and dignitaries of the catholic- Church- in – diaspora know this, and for this reason they find themselves in radical contradiction with the ‘conciliar Roman church’ and those with positions of authority.

The end of the year 1965 stands under the sign of this contradiction, and also marks the beginning of a thorny way for the diaspora. At that time the question was raised not only as to how many would be ready to knowingly and courageously engaged on this way, but also to do what was necessary and right to ensure survival- for one self and with others. For it not at all easy to persevere and endure in a diaspora-state of affairs, especially if it was going to extend over several generations (those who were old in 1965 have, in 1990, since died ).

THE GREAT WEAKNESS OF RESISTANCE

The death of Pius XII in 1958 was felt as a strange void by many. Mourning for this “ rock in the midst of ocean-breakers” was unbounded and unanimous on the part of the catholic faithful. It was from this time on that the apostolic Roman Catholic Church, increasingly took on the character of a diaspora-Church, and ( understandably) this went unnoticed by the overwhelming majority of the faithful. It was only seven years after, in 1965, that it became more noticeable. However, there was no transformation of its essence, and only its state and way of life had changed.

In the light of this knowledge this question can again be raised: what would be the situation of the Church at the end of the diaspora-itinerary, if in the meantime no way out had been found for it? Would it come to the state of affairs in the Church described by St. Paul: ‘the same Lord, the same Faith, the same Baptism’ (Eph. 4,5)? Or rather, would the state of the Church at the end of its way be more in line with what St. John describes in Ch. 12, 13-18 of the Apocalypse? ‘The Woman’ there mentioned would not pertain so much to Mary as to the persecuted Church: which would flee into the ‘wilderness’, to her ‘place of refuge (…) where she would be well hidden from the serpent’s sight”. The dragon, however, filled with fury, would in his fight “make war on the rest of her children, on those who kept God’s commandments and held fast to the truth concerning Jesus".

We are still far from this point, because one cannot compare the diaspora to a ‘desert’, in which both persecuted and refugees are obliged to eke out an existence as they can. In the diaspora the opportunity to forge weapons, set up an army (…), and rise up against the neighbouring enemy, dissimu-lated in the bosom of the ‘conciliar church’- still exist!

In no way was this enemy a ’dragon’ or a ‘beast in service of the dragon’, or even an enormous scorpion whose bite was to be feared, but a large inflated tortoise with scintillating colours, subsisting on flies and worms, all it had it was a gaping mouth which continuously emitted pseudo-prophecies and inane promises without intermittence. And this is what Rome, “urbi et orbi” has been doing before the world since 1965 … Without a well defined enemy, the Catholic diaspora-Church is only fighting against windmills. It ceases to be the “Ecclesia militans” proceeding on its way (…) However even Resistance-fighters themselves will become battle-weary, their resources being exhausted. It is then that they will hang on mystical crosses(…)

An ineptitude bordering on coma characterizes the ‘leadership’ of the diaspora-Church. This was remarked on right at the beginning, between 1962 and 1969. This is not to be attributed so much to the continual vacancy of the apostolic See, as to three deficiencies concerning the dioceses. One did not have to look too far to try to find a solution for them:

1. There was no organized social structure of the diaspora-Church. This would have had a really useful role to play in preventing the spread of already latent sectarianism, and many groups, larger or smaller, would have benefited from it.

2. There was no central regional (as opposed to national) council of Catholics with a proper theological formation, (e.g. for the German speaking countries). This council would have been competent to give practical directives and guidelines in organizing the life of the ‘exiled’ Church. The faithful would have referred to them for a ruling on either religious or canonical matters. This council would have confirmed them in the Faith, thus not permit-ting them to feel abandoned to themselves.

3. The absence of competent catechists for young adults who had already begun to work or had a career, who could deal with such issues as Christian marriages and the foundation of Christian families, apart from dealing with problems which cropped up in a diaspora situation…Now as a general rule, the priests were almost always inept at catechising adults because they were not trained accordingly. This had been generally admitted by experts in the matter. Only those lay-people who had received a theological formation and who were actively involved in adult education and were in touch with their problems were to be considered. Alas, the ones who would have fulfilled all these criteria were not easy to find. Fortunately there was also a need for other kinds of catechists, for which the demand could be met: catechism lessons for children, for example, could be entrusted to parents, since the faithful of the diaspora were well aware of their obligations.

"HOPING AGAINST HOPE"

Is it still possible to remedy the three main causes weakening the catholic diaspora -Church? This oppressive question has been actual for quite some time. Yet with others, I am of the opinion that twenty-five years of unattained goals and the regrettable experiences of that period will have made the situation irremediable. The only hope would be a special miracle worked by Christ Himself which would dissipate this general inefficacity, based almost entirely on human respect. By this miracle, many would clearly recognize that Our Lord never abandons His own, above all, when through no fault of their own they have been dispersed!

There are those who see the situation and understand how it came about without having the necessary means to rectify the weaknesses. As for the others, it is a fact that Christ does not love cowards and weaklings, but favours the valiant, who ‘hope against hope’ and expect help only from the Lord, and not from certain men posing as liberators and messengers of hope Christ Himself raised the alarm against these usurpers, presenting themselves in ‘sheep’s clothing’ but who in reality were ravenous wolves (…). There are quite a few Catholics of our ranks who (probably because they didn’t see the diaspora-actuality clearly or realistically enough), believed that the situation of the Church would redress itself “when we have true catholic bishops again”, as they said. But even though we do possess some bishops who can be so considered, the state of affairs has not changed at all: The fact that such bishops exist is of no use for ending this diaspora existence. And this is confirmed by the experience of many.

An effective way of helping redress the situation would be missionary activity by lay-apostles with fixed, readily attainable objectives set before them. Bur their ‘modus operandi’ would be completely different to that adopted by the brash, hypocritical “Pro Pope and Church Movement”. Our lay-missionaries would be humble and simple, their only ideal being to serve Christ and His Church, always prepared to be courageously outspoken in bearing witness to Christ, and unswerving in carrying out His commandments. Obviously the lukewarm or cowardly would be excluded from their ranks.

When He founded His Church, Christ did not restrict Himself to just the apostles, but He had disciples too, whom He also sent on missions. Today it is painful and sad to think that modern Catholics are no longer aware that they are disciples too, or, if they are, they don’t act accordingly. Alas! The most one can expect today is to encounter spiritual descendants of the two disciples of Emmaus: slow of wit and dull of heart, and held back by human respect. Are we bound to accept this state of affairs? By no means! A change for the is within our reach. We must not forget that Our Lord wishes us to always turn to Him in prayer, because He is truly our Lord and Master. Nobody, whether cleric or layman, can achieve anything without Him! (…) More is required than just being personally pious and devout in order to save one’s soul in a diaspora situation. Has not Christ said: “he who tries to save his life will lose it”?

At this point, no one can tell for how long this diaspora period of the Church, which has been so shaken in its principle of apostolicity, will endure. and it is Christ and He alone who will reverse the situation when the right moment comes. Whatever we want and would seek to attain is of no avail. Who would dare to deny that in one way or an other he did not have a share in the responsibility for the miserable state of affairs at present? Yes, the guilt must be laid on the shoulders of the clergy, of course, but the failure of the lay-people must also not be under-estimated. There is quite a lot to be done by them before the situation improves. But they must work according to Christ’s mandates: “He does not gather with Me scatters”. Otherwise the situation will get a lot worse before it gets better. And no “gathering with Christ” is possible without the laity participating in missionary apostolate specifically for them. This is something which certain diaspora bishops ought to understand. And unless the situation has changed, there is only one bishop so far to have grasped this. The rest of us live like ostriches with their heads buried in the sand. We are still mistakenly orientated to living our Faith in the context of Church conditions of the past. We fail to realize that these are completely incompatible with the vastly different conditions of today: the problems we are con-fronted with did not exist in those days.

Recently a book was published in the United States:” Will the Catholic Church survive the twentieth century?” The title alone indicates how the traditionalists who used it were labouring under the illusion that the Church could be ‘salvaged’ by them. This only goes to show how far they had strayed from an adequate appraisal of the situation of the apostolic Roman catholic Church today. Not only were they on the wrong track but they were fumbling blindly around without the slightest clue as to the reality of the situation. Let us explain. The upper ranks of the hierarchy are to be blamed for the Church’s downfall. Its (reaedificatio) rebuilding from the ruins can take place in only one way- from the grass-roots level up, with the means best adapted for this, and obviously with Christ divine assistance, for without that one would only be building on shifting sand and mud.

A DIVINE CHASTISMENT

Despite the fact that the diaspora situation of the Roman Catholic Church has now existed for over 25 years, it is unfortunate that many are still not aware of this. It may be considered as a chastisement from the Holy Trinity, being more remedial in nature rather than purely vindictive . As such, one must not shrink from it. To do so would be as stupid and childish as to reject a salutary medicinal potion being offered, just because it was bitter. This applies for us too. For our condition as members of a diaspora Church is just as bitter. Certainly it is no sweet treat!

Every now and again we meet with Catholics, pious enough, but nevertheless discontent with their lot. They continually lament that they have not Pope or bishops. But I ask them why is this so terrible? Is Christ alone not sufficient to us?…Apart from showing us which are the ways we are to go, is He Himself not The Way? Aren’t these words of Our Lord clear enough for these anxious Catholics? Yet paradoxically, in the meantime these roads which lead directly to Him are practically deserted, though signposts are to be found all over the roads. But the crux of the matter is that these signposts are now obsolete; for His Camp has shifted, though its old buildings still remain standing. Most still follow these old signposts. There are only very few enlightened Catholics in our ranks who are aware that these signs must now be read from an altogether different perspective: In other words, why do we not break once and for all with the ‘dead’ (fallen-away) members of the Church, rather seeking to establish contact with its living members? One can no longer unquestioningly accept the present – day popes and bishops as the “light of the world” per se, even though they may be considered ’validly elected”. .It is useless, pleading ignorance in the matter any longer either in order to escape one’s responsibilities. The spiritual well-being of our fellow-Christians and the good of the Church as a whole are at stake!

It does not suffice to profess and adhere to the true doctrines of the Church. This doctrine must also be intelligently presented so that it can bear its fruit in due season. In fact, the doctrine of the Faith lends itself to critical analysis. It well withstands the test of being scrutinised in this way. One cannot say as much for trendy present –day ideologies, or for the so-called World Religions. Specifically Christian doctrines, however, are clear and logical. In no way are they a confusing, incoherent jumble of religiously coloured dicta ! For heaven’s sake, why don’t Catholics listen to Him Who is not only the source of truth, but Who IS Truth Itself? Instead, they pay attention to heretics, even considering them as “theologians”… They seem to have forgotten that Christ and the apostles also taught, commanded, and put into practice what they taught! Why don’t Catholics read the Acts of the Apostles in an intelligent way? They are full of common sense, and so are applicable to present – day conditions. Surely it will strike some that there is nothing so new in the situation we are confronted with today- they already existed in the days of the apostles! History-whether secular or ecclesiastical, tends to repeat itself. A truly militant Catholic Church can never reach its final goal in this world/ It is itinerant by nature and this fact must not be overlooked. It is never set in a fixed geographical location, or native to any particular place, because it is of this world, but not of it. (…) The catholic Church – in diaspora – always bears these hallmarks.It is in contrast to Church militant, despite its weakened state. It is in contrast to the conciliar Church which is adapted to the ‘world’. and to the ‘spirit of the world’.

The conciliar ‘church’, which has otherwise accepted all catholic sectarian groups and associations into its ranks, has not succeeded in winning over and destroying the Catholic diaspora Church, despite the latter’s generally weakened condition , because Jesus Christ is its foundation-stone and its Lord. (…) And even here, those who are dispersed but nevertheless belong to the apostolic Roman Catholic Church (the “Mater et Magistra” of old) can be distinguished from those who have gone astray in the Faith, but still call themselves catholics. But that they are not Roman Catholics can be easily verified, even indirectly. In fact, those Catholics who are aware of their diaspora condition are usually convinced Christo-centric fundamentalists and confirmed sede-vacantists as well. It is high time that the Catholic Church in diaspora finally accepted its status quo and acted accordingly. Many of its members in diverse regions, though aware that the one true Church was not exactly ‘in the limelight’ should now resolve to overcome their fear of human respect, the greatest obstacle to openly acknowledging Christ, the sole’ Good Shepherd’. Till the stumbling-block of human respect is not put aside, Catholics cannot forge ahead with zeal in bearing witness to Christ or obey His command to “arise, be not afraid!” (Matt. 17, 7), or “do not be afraid, speak out and refuse to be silenced” ( Acts 18,9). There are special graces given to the Church –in – diaspora.. Why refuse to accept them? Nobody is more aware of our situation and that of the Church today then Christ Him-self. He is The Teacher par excellence. So why not accept His teachings? It were better to repudiate those false teachers (both men and women) causing such ravages by both their ‘catechising’ and their teaching of class-room curricula. No Catholic adhering to the true Faith could in conscience confide the teaching of his children to such individuals (…).

CATHOLICS IN THE SHADOW OF THE CONCILIAR CHURCH

The apostate conciliar church, with its new doctrines, new cult, new rites, and new canon law has become a real sociological entity, despite many difficulties, to such an extent that it has now eclipsed the real Catholic Church (of the diaspora) from public view. Its existence is not remarked by society, nor by the liberal democratic states. Even the mass-media and the German Christian democratic political parties seem to be unaware of its presence. So to what extent is a disapora Church detectable? It is visible- more or less- . Its characteristic of holiness- less so, which does not mean that it is not there. The conciliar church, on the other hand, is readily seen by all, whether Catholics or non-Catholics. But where are those who clearly and distinctly discern that this monstrous entity has nothing whatsoever to do with the apostolic R.C. Church of old?

The Church is a specific socio-religious entity existing in this world, but divinely instituted, by the Son of God. It is built on the foundation of the prophets and apostles. Christ also instituted the sacraments (visible channels of grace) in it in a determined order. Now it is important for the members of the (diaspora)Church to take into account that in the course of salvific history the sacraments are transmitted from one generation to an other by means of a specific process. They would do well to take note of this, because with the help of grace the weakness in the Church could be surmounted; with this awareness, the diaspora Church would be prevented from taking the wrong course, thus aggravating the situation. Moreover, diaspora Catholics ought to recall that Our Lord Jesus Christ is there to defend the weak. He never sides with the strong and self reliant. It is necessary to make a distinction between weak and weaklings. The latter are characterized by cowardice. And if one reflects on the matter, most of those who cry “make peace not war” are cowards. They prefer to stay on the sidelines as onlookers, or they “disappear into thin air” when Christ is blasphemed or publicly ridiculed or slandered, by words or pictures, and this is legally permitted! Such is the general situation today. Today’s (diaspora) Catholics have come to realize that in spite of the perplexity of some situations and manoeuvres to divert from admitting the reality of the situation, after they were separated from the conciliar church, it was evident for them, that the Church could not continue without the sacraments of Baptism and Matrimony. This was something new and thought-provoking for many, including several members of the clergy. It seemed that the priest was not absolutely indispensable for administering the sacrament of Baptism, independently of the fact that the diaspora situation of the Church is ipse facto an ’emergency’ one. For example it would be a grave, irreparable crime not to see to it that , in the absence of priests, their children were and receiving the sacrament of Marriage.

Now the diaspora Church has the mission and the duty to reorganize and set up regulative norms for these two realities: this task would fall on the central regional council of which we spoke earlier - the only organization competent to assume this responsibility. The aim would be to realistically tackle any problems as they came, without referring back to the past and wishing that they would be other than what they were.

No one knows the future, even of his own life, because it is a secret of God. He rarely allows a preview of what will happen, but sometimes he does so indirectly by indicating that one has taken a wrong turn on the “religious” road. As for the famous ‘signs of the times’- they have to be discerned first as to whether they come from God or from the devil. It is also somewhat bizarre that these days many people who are ‘shipwrecked’ both morally and religiously walk behind the banner of “religious liberty”- whether moral or religious. In the meantime, what is there to prevent the diaspora Church from openly coming to the fore under its own banner- a visible ‘sign of contradiction’ at least, on the regional level? Understandably, this would require courage, determination and fortitude in the face of inevitable reversals. Then there was the question of the pusillanimous. Who would encourage them and bolster up their hope? …

“Since our salvation is founded upon the hope of something. Hope would not be hope at all if its object were in view. How could a man still hope for something which he already sees? And if we are hoping for something still unseen, the we need endurance to wait for it.” (Rom. 8, 24 ff). Patience implies a passive attitude. The Christian virtue of hope is not vague or indeterminate, but it has an absolute, unconditional goal: He Who IS the Way and the Truth.

THE TIME IS NOT YET RIPE FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE CHURCH

The more one comes to terms with the reality of the apostate, heretical ‘conciliar church’, the more its treachery is exposed; but there are many obvious disadvantages and weaknesses found right throughout the diaspora-Church. The vacancy of the Holy See dating from 1958 is one that is readily visible, but it is not the only one. Since the beginning of the diaspora, when the Church had hardly begun to muster its forces, and later, when it was engaged in active Resistance, its efforts were unfortunately dissipated and not properly organized. They were directed more against somewhat secondary issues resulting from the Council.

For the fundamental evils and defects attacking the very base of the Catholic Church’s structure were regrettably only vaguely perceived, and this hindered and even aggravated attempts to reconstruct the Church in those early stages.

If we now consider the prospect for the Church in different regions throughout the world, we must conclude that ‘5 past midnight’ has definitively struck. As for the state of affairs globally no-one is in a position to judge this except the Lord , Who is the Head of the Church, and those whom He chooses to reveal the global situation. Those of us who live so dispersed have to bide our time, whilst “putting our hope in the Lord as long as we live. We don’t have private revelations or dreams or strange and ridiculous so-reputed Marian ‘apparitions’. We hear no voices (interior or exterior) announcing what will happen to us in the near or distant future, telling us what we should think, or what course of action we should adopt (…) No, but our lot is to persist in the belief that Christ Our Lord will have pity on us and come to the rescue of the innocent and helpless. (…)

When Vatican II definitely broke with the R.C. Church of old (…) it was powerless to essentially change it, apart from affecting its day to day life and its ‘state’ as a Church.

Several were quite concerned at seeing this definitive break, but fewer still could gauge its real implications. Furthermore, the handful of those who were now outcasts or exiles in the diaspora camp were in the precarious situation of being shunned by editors of Catholic publications and journals.

Several were quite concerned at seeing this definitive break, but fewer still could gauge its real implications. Furthermore, the handful of those who were now outcasts or exiles in the diaspora camp were in the precarious situation of being shunned by editors of Catholic publications and journals. There was general opposition to them both from Catholic editors and readers who put up protective cotton-wool walls around themselves; who shrivelled you with scorching fire leaping from their eyes if you dared to refuse to blow the trumpet of the holy ‘council’ like all the bishops. It is astonishing to see how certain Catholics, very well grounded in their Faith, suddenly changed camp (…)

At this moment certain old, unresolved problems which were always deferred till later came to the fore again. For example the problem of unity between the laity and the clergy in the Church had been considered ‘normal’ for quite a long time. The cause of unity was certainly hindered by the devastating effects of clericalism whose roots went back to the 18th century. Clericalism was a great impediment to unity in the Church.

There were a considerable number of Catholics who kept the Faith integrally but just did not see the parallelism between the diaspora Church and the new conciliar church. Not because they were naive, but because their attention was being continually diverted by disputes on matters of secondary importance (…) This was a deliberate strategy, used to camouflage the rupture with the venerable Catholic Church of old. It was a pity that the vast majority of the faithful were devoid of a critical sense; and it is precisely because of that that it was easy to “pull the wool over their eyes” with the insidious introduction of the sacrilegious celebration of the “Supper of the Lord”, or the “Eucharist” (una cum Roncalli or Montini). Those of the faithful who participated in them were unteachable. They refused to want to know what was really going on. And here a difficult question of rather a different nature cropped up: where there any Catholics, especially more educated ones, who were prepared to take supplementary advanced Catechism courses in order to spread and defend the Faith? But how could such adults be contacted? They might be found amongst friends ant acquaintances. A personal approach might prove fruitful, but there were more efficient ways of doing it. It was quickly realized that a basic strategy for apostolic activity was wanting. It would be specifically adapted to laity of the diaspora. For such a program to be useful, however, quite a number of ‘applicants‘ for this project were needed, and their work would have to be backed up. But this was an impossible dream. In fact, a good, useful and pertinent plan of action would be sure to attract a lot of attention, especially in a time of general religious confusion. On the whole, all would be aware of such a program, unless they were spiritually blind or had no interest in their Church.

THE DIASPORA CHURCH – AN UNDENIABLE FACT

In the 60’s most of those whom we discussed Church problems with thought that the diaspora Church was a ‘fiction’. But in the 70’s, the number of sceptics had considerably diminished. And in the 80’s, none of those still around used the term ‘fiction’ any more. A few were conscious of being diaspora Catholics, even within their own families, and were at a loss what to do about it. Sons and daughters- in – law, parents and friends scoffed at them. At the best they were considered as out-dated, refusing the spirit of aggiornamento. More than living on the outskirts of society, they were outside it! They are to be situated in the Catholic diaspora Church. As such, they seem weak. In reality they are stronger than all those around them. They know where they are going and will on no account deviate from the way. Nor do they flee to hide themselves away, but it is true that the way is narrow, on the other hand, it is precisely because of this that it leads on more easily to their destination. (…)

Despite the fact that the Apostolic Church was still viable, priests and theologians tainted with clericalism continued to point out to others that it was no longer so strong and powerful, in order to negate its existence in their eyes. However, as the Apostolic Church was gradually transformed into the diaspora (or eclipsed) Church, the latter’s weaknesses became more clearly evident. For its progress through time it now took an other route. But because the detour was so sudden and unexpected, it was impossible to raise the alarm about its changes of direction. To put it another way: if a child falls into a well, the best one can hope for is to retrieve him from it covered with bruises – provided his cries for help have been heard. After the years 1962-65, “the children of the Catholic Church” fell into a deep well en masse. A large number of ‘rescuers’ would have been necessary to get them all out. And as for the ‘vineyard of the Lord’ there was less and less to see of it because the field-mice had burrowed and bred extensively in it. Several ask themselves where they had sprung from. Others, better informed, could have told them that they had been there for quite a long time.

In the 60’s, especially in the Catholic countries, there were also those who would previously never have admitted any criticism of the holy Catholic Church and had always defended it, who now turned away with aversion from the official Church (it was considered as such) and refused to have any more dealings with it. How could one interpret this phenomenon? Amongst those busying themselves with the matter there were two trains of thought, but both were wrong. Some thought that it was something to do with an ‘internal emigration’ or a ‘spiritual emigration’ of the Catholic Church. But that would have signified apostasy (of the Church). The others- clergy for the most part- spoke inconsiderately of ‘the apostasy of the Catholic Faith’ and they thought that these recalcitrant Catholics had ipso facto become infidels because one never saw them at the new masses on Sundays. The reality was that in their case it was nothing at all to do with having lost the Faith! On the contrary, it was a defensive attitude, an instinctive way of protecting themselves against all the evils springing up and proliferating all around them, as a result of the reformative council. This type of Catholic was generally of a higher social and cultural level, hardly deserving the label ‘apostate’, even if he sometimes declared quite loudly and bravely that in the future he would keep well at a distance from all that was going on in the Church. But his ‘bark was worse than his bite’, for it was a burst of suppressed anger resulting from all the terrible things he had heard or undergone, including having his name blackened. Basically, without being aware of it, this type of Catholic sought to escape the ‘spirit of the Council’ and its consequences for the Church as a whole. But who was going to enlighten this category of Catholic and help him understand that the R.C. Church was already on diaspora course? For the present, nobody knows where these indignant Catholics are to be found, or what’s become of them. Somehow, in the process of the Church being eclipsed they were dispersed and later, apart from a few cases, they could not be recuperated.

Whether traditionalists or progressivists, old-Catholics or neo-modernists, all commonly shared the belief that the conciliar church since its inception was a stylised sort of Catholicism with a new set of creeds. This belief was also held by those who did not know enough about the reasons for the coming into being of the exiled R.C. Church. These different groups overlooked the fact that this conciliar church also bears the hallmarks of a grotesque new ‘Counter-Church’. These Catholics perpetually move around in circles, on cue like trained circus-horses in the ring, held on leashes by an invisible ‘dompteur’ (trainer), and applauded by a huge crowd of spectators. The latter, having paid for their tickets (i.e. church-taxes), now expect to see a good show for their money … To explain this: ordinarily the throngs in the church are passive by nature and slow to react. What the ‘religious’ throngs expect from the conciliar church nowadays is not salvation but a panem et circenses (bread and games) spectacle, with as much variety as possible, and no strings attached.

NO ROSY FUTURE IN VIEW

What can a few dispersed individuals do in such a vast field of action? The R.C. Church will certainly survive through the centuries. There is no doubt about this. Christ is with it and with its frail members. The only question now is, how will it survive? If we make a survey, there is much uncertainty about the situation, even in Europe, where it is easier than elsewhere to make an appraisal. Together with others, I personally don’t pin too much hope on a so -called diaspora organized ‘semi-council’ for specific purposes, or even for a ‘papal election’, without there first being a form of operational organization specially adapted to the R.C. Church. And it would be much better to first organize it on the regional level before proceeding to the supra-regional level. The first duty of the Church in exiled conditions is to strive to achieve unity. This is done by respecting and adopting as norms all those principles which foster ecclesiastical unity 4), remembering that the Church is situated on a higher plane than conventional sociological entities in the world.

The conciliar roman Church does not just exist in Rome, where its leader can be located- except when he’s off on another “pilgrimage”. It is also ensconced in all those dioceses where it has been able to make a ‘peaceful’ takeovers of territory without encountering resistance. The term for it is occupation… As for the occupants themselves, they are none other than thieves and plunderers of others’ property. Unfortunately, they have not received any reproaches for their usurpation – members of the diaspora resistance are too feeble to fight. But in the meantime no one is obliged to pay church-taxes or other donations to those occupants! (Apart from the fact that exiled Catholics have only dry bread to look forward to anyway!) And how can someone who contributes church-taxes be walled Catholic? …That Catholics are only too few in number is demonstrated by the rare exceptions who step out of the conciliar church set-up…

If Catholics wish to avoid doing harm to their souls or diminishing the liveliness of their Faith through apathy, self-pity, inactivity or refusal to ‘open their mouths’, first of all they have to be aware of two dangers existing at the present time, but which are fundamentally different from one another:

1. The colossal monstrosity of the heretical apostate conciliar roman church, with its members and adepts and

2. The great weakness of the R.C. diaspora Church. Unfortunately, this situation is not helped by its members. This Church leads a separate existence from the conciliar church. For after all, as any reasonable person would admit, one cannot provide a cure for any physical or moral ailments unless these have been diagnosed. Unless this is done, inevitably one arrives at a dead end. And this has been the state of affairs for many years now, without there having been any improvement in the exiled Church’s condition. Nobody can deny this fact.

It is high time to do some stock-taking so is not to flounder completely. Furthermore, exiled Catholics should also beware of their ‘traditionalist’ (sic) enemies, because for many of the faithful they are just as dangerous as the conciliar ones!…It is useless and meaningless for Catholics to worry and make wild speculations about the future of the Church, and what duties and responsibilities every baptised member has. For, as St. Paul says: in the Church “all are members of one another; if one member suffers, the other suffers with it”.

Now the Catholic Church in exile is suffering from a generalised, clearly perceptible weakness, resulting from specific causes. The least that can be done is to diagnose them. Efforts in this direction could be made by concerted action on the regional level- if that were still feasible. And for the exiled condition of the Church itself- there was a moment in time when it began. So why should there not be a term to all this in the future? Let us pray unceasingly and sincerely to Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd, to obtain His help! For all who are not with Him are against Him! And He knows them all by name!…

Remarks:
1) Note: First written in 1973, this article was somewhat modified in 1990 and more extensive revisions were made in July 2000 by the author. The first part is abridged here, with editorial comments from EINSICHT.
2) The „little flock“ consists of disciples and apostles called by the Lord; they are to be distinguished from the far more numerous “followers“.
3) Apart from that Roncalli had eliminated the Prologue of St. John at the end of the Mass. That was an embarrassing sign!
4) Contrary to the situation in Europe, in Mexico this reconstruction has been ongoing for some time now. There, not only diaspora communities have flourished but real parishes have cropped up where pastoral activities take place on a regular basis.







 
(c) 2004-2018 brainsquad.de