54. Jahrgang Nr. 4 / Juni 2024
Datenschutzerklärung | Zum Archiv | Suche




Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2004
Widerstand? - Fehl(er)anzeige!


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Dezember 2004
Notstand: einbetoniert ... oder doch: Extra Ecclesiam salus est?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Misericordias Domini in aeternum cantabo - Autobiographie von Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc, Erzbischof von Hué, übersetzt von Elisabeth Meurer


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Öffentliche Verkündigung der DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Februar 2004
Enzyklika Mystici Corporis


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2004
Offener Brief an H.H. Bischof M. Pivaruns


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2004
Eberhard Heller: Der Fall Y. Yurchik: Aufnahme in die röm.-kath. Kirche?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2005
Zum Tode von Johannes Paul II.


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
L’ERREUR FONDAMENTALE DE VATICAN II


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Open Letter to most Reverend Bishop M. Pivarunas


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
ROTHKRANZ Y LAS INVESTIGACIONES...


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL ERROR PRINCIPAL DEL VATICANO II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL HABITO HACE AL MONJE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
HABEMUS PAPAM?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A commentary on the present situation of the Church


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Am Scheideweg


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografa de Monseor P. M. Ng-dinh-Thuc - Prologo


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Apendice II - Documentos


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
Surrexit Christus, spes mea


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
La silla apostlica ocupada


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2003
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
Der Hauptirrtum des II. Vatikanums - Vorwort


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
ber den Papst


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
LEglise Catholique-Romaine de la diaspora


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia (esp.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A commentary on the present situation of the Church (engl.)


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2003
Warum kein islamischer Religionsunterricht


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Reflexiones sobre la fiesta de Navidad


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
The Apostolic See Occupied


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
The Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Guerard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Mgr. Lefebvre est-il vque ou simple lac?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1971
Zur Frage der Gltigkeit der heiligen Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
Ich bin allein


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
Buchbesprechung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
Alla ricerca dellunit perduta


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
In Search of lost unity (engl/spa)


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2002
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Der Apostolische Stuhl


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Die Weihe von P. Gurard des Lauriers zum Bischof


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
How can you be a christian without Church?


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Le Sige apostolique < occup >


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La conscration piscopale du P. Gurard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La sede apostolica


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La consacrazione di P. Gurard des Lauriers a vescovo


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
LA IGLESIA CATOLICO-ROMANA EN LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
Ha permitido Roma el viejo rito misal


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
A la recherche de l'unit perdue


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2001
Christus erstand, Er, mein Hoffen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Offener Brief an H.H. P. Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
SOLO LA VIEJA MISA


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
Anmerkungen zum Briefwechsel mit H.H. Pater Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
VIVA EL CHRISTO REY! - STATIONEN EINER REISE DURCH MEXIKO -


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
ERKLRUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
Abri der modernen Geschichte der katholischen Kirche in Mexiko


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
SER CRISTIANO SIN IGLESIA? - UNA PONENCIA-


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
EIN NICHT UNFEHLBARER PAPST


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
VIVA CRISTO REY! -ESTACIONES DE UN VIAJE POR MJICO-


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
Religin en Mjico


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION (dt/espa)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 2001
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
Der Papst steht in der katholischen Kirche nicht zur Disposition


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
Die Weissagung


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1971
SCHACHER MIT DER MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 1972
QUELLEN DER GLAUBENSLEHRE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1998
Appell an den Redakteur der EINSICHT


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1998
UNFEHLBAR UND FEHLBAR ZUGLEICH


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1998
Kirchensteuer und


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
ERKLRUNG S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1997
SEKTIERERTUM ALS VORGABE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1997
DIE RESTITUTION DER KIRCHE ALS RECHTSGEMEINSCHAFT


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1998
ZUM PROBLEM DER RESTITUTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1993
DER HL. ALBERTUS MAGNUS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1994
Offener Brief an Herrn Jean-Gerard Roux


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1996
VERSINKT DER KATHOLISCHE WIDERSTAND IM SEKTIERERTUM?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1995
Anhang: Die wichtigsten uerungen des Lehramtes zu Thomas von Aquin


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1995
NUR NOCH AUSLAUFMODELL?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Mrz, Doppelnr. 5-6 1996
IN MEMORIAM H.H. PFR. FRANZ MICHAEL PNIOK


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1994
Nachruf auf Herrn Jean Andr Perlant


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
La Santisima Trinidad


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1994
ber die geistliche Vollkommenheit


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1992
ARCHBISHOP NGO-DINH-THUC MARTYR FOR THE FAITH


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1992
DECLARATIO DE CONSECRATIONIBUS EPISCOPORUM


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1992
Zum Problem der gegenwrtigen Vakanz des rmischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar-Mrz 1993
Zum Problem der gegenwrtigen Vakanz des rmischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1991
EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLRUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1991
ZUM TODE VON HERRN ANACLETO GONZALEZ FLORES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1991
IN ERINNERUNG AN BISCHOF MOISS CARMONA RIVERA


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
ZEHN JAHRE SEDISVAKANZERKLRUNG S.E. MGR. P. M. NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLRUNG lat/dt/engl/fr/span/ital


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
ZEUGNIS DES GLAUBENS - ZUM PROBLEM DER GEGENWRTIGEN VAKANZ DES RMISCHEN STUHLES -


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1990
WEITERE EINZELHEITEN ZUR ENTFHRUNG VON S.E. MGR. NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1990
ZUR PROBLEMATIK DER RESTITUTION DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Mrz 1989
APPELL AN SEINE MITBRDER


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai/Juni 1987
DER BRUCH FAND NICHT STATT!


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Mrz 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1985
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1985
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/Mrz 1986
BITTSCHREIBEN AN UNSERE BISCHFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1984
LESERBRIEFE, LESERMEINUNG...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1984
ZUR BISCHOFSWEIHE VON MGR. GNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1985
ZEIGE MIR, HERR, DEINE WEGE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2006
Wenn die Kirche nicht gttlich wre... 2. Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
Die Ereignisse der beiden letzten Jahre


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
EINIGE ANMERKUNGEN ZU DEN VON MGR. NGO-DINH-THUC UND MGR. CARMONA GESPENDETEN BISCHOFSWEIHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
DIE ANGRIFFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
ZUM PROBLEM DER BISCHOFSWEIHEN UND DER DECLARATIO VON S.E. ERZBISCHOF NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
BRIEF VON HERRN REKTOR A.D. OTTO BRAUN AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 1984
Eine Erklrung von Mgr. M.L. Gurard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
BRIEF AN S.E. MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
NACHRUFE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
ERZBISCHOF PETER MARTIN NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
H.H. PFARRER JOSEF LEUTENEGGER IN MNCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Oktober 1982
EINIGE ANMERKUNGEN ZU DEN ... GESPENDETEN BISCHOFSWEIHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1982
STURMWOLKEN BER DER GANZEN WELT


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
Declaration concernant Palmar


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1981
BRIEF AN MSGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
SECTE ORTHODOXE?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
QU'EST-CE DIRE: LA NOUVELLE MESSE PEUT TRE VALIDE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
LETTRES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
REPONSE DE HR L'ABBE HANS MILCH AUX QUESTIONS


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1981
QUE SIGNIFIE LA COEXISTENCE DES RITES PRE- ET POSTCONCILIAIRES


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
KANON 188, 4 DES CIC


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
Protestation de Foi Catholique - franz/deutsch


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
LO UNICO QUE QUEREMOS ES LA MlSA TRIDENTINA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2006
Und ihr werdet sein wie Gott


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1979
BRIEF AN MGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
OFFENER BRIEF AN HERRN PROF.DR. HEINZ KREMERS


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1980
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
Konzil von Trient: Dekret ber das Sakrament der Eucharistie - ERLSUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1977
DIE LITURGISCHE SPRACHE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1977
Konzil von Trient: Dekret ber das Meopfer


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1977
DIE DOGMATISCHEN BESTIMMUNGEN DES TRIDENTINUMS ZUR PRIESTERWEIHE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
EN LA ENCRUCIJADA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
la croise des chemins


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
At the crossroads


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
Y seris como Dios (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
And thou wilt be like God (Gen. 3,5)


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 1er continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 3. continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
APPENDICE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1976
EMPFEHLUNGEN ZUM VERHALTEN DER PRIESTER


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1972
DIE LOGIK EINES THEOLOGEN


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1974
Papa haereticus


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Carta a Su Eminencia el obispo XXX


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Letter to His Excellency xxxx


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
LA SANTISIMA TRINIDAD


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Et vous serez comme Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaratio


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaracin


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Dclaration


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Dichiarazione


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Brief an einen Bischof...


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Fvrier 1982
COEXISTENCE PACIFIQUE?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Fvrier 1982
POUR L'AMOUR DE LA VERITE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
DE LA RESISTANCE CATHOLIQUE A L'OCCUPATION MODERNISTE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
Mgr. Lefebvre est-il vque ou simple lac?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
LE TEMPS DE L'APOCALYPSE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
SIEGE ET CHUTE DE LA FORTERESSE ROMAINE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
DECLARAT ION OF MGR. M.L. GURARD DES LAURIERS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
SACRE DE M. L'ABBE GNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
MISE AU POINT DE LA SAKA SUR LE SACRE DE L'ABB G. STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
QUE PENSER DE LA MISE AU POINT DE M. ALPHONSE EISELE?


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
LE CAS DU PAPE HONORIUS (625-638)


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
DE ECCLESIAE CAPITE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ORTHODOX SECT?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
THE APOSTOLIC CHAIR VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ONCE MORE: PRECISE QUESTIONS TO ECNE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
A PROCLAMATION ON 'THE NEW MASS AND THE POPE'


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Februar 1981
NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: AN ANTI-MASS, Part 2


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LE CANON 188, N 4 OU: OU EST L'EGLISE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LETTRE A MSGR. LEFBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
MONTRE-MOI TES CHEMINS, SEIGNEUR


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
OUR LADY OF FATIMA AND THE HOLY FATHER


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
DE APOSTOLICA SEDE


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
INFORMATIONS OF THE EDITOR


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
NUAGES NOIRS SUR LE MONDE ENTIER


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
THE SO-CALLED 'EXCOMMUNICATION' OF H.E. ARCHBISHOP NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
JUAN PABLO II. NO ES UN PAPA CATOLICO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
VATICAN II FACE LA TRADITION


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
REPONSE DE M. L'ABB MILCH A LA LETTRE OUVERTE DU M. HELLER


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
FALSE BISHOPS AND TRUE BISHOPS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
IS ONE A SCHISMATIC, WHEN IN OUR DAYS ONE CONSIDERS THE CHAIR OF ST. PETER AS VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY' OF THE SO-CALLED 'ROMAN CATHOLIC'


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
THE ARIANISM - AN EXAMPLE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE CONSENSUS FIDELIUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
MONSEOR LEFEBVRE COMO PROFETA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
LE NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: UNE ANTI-MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
SEULEMENT, QUAND LE FILS DE L'HOMME REVIENDRA TROUVERA-TIL LA FOI SUR LA TERRE?


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Oktober 1981
LA BANDE DES QUATRE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
APPEL DU 16.4.1979


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
Vox FIDEl: LA VOIX DE LA FOl OU L'ORGANE DES SOUHAITS


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. LOUIS VEZELIS O.F.M. (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ng-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
ALGUNAS CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LAS CONSAGRACIONES EPISCOPALES


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
BREVES OBSERVATIONS SUR LES SACRES EPISCOPAUX


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
THE APOSTOLIC CHAIR VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
MGR. LEFEBVRE AS PROPHET


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
STORM CLOUDS OVER THE WHOLE WORLD


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
LA TRADICION


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
SECTE ORTHODOXE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
A ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP SPEAKS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
LE CAS BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE CASE BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE QUESTION OF THE PAPACY TODAY


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
I believe in the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
The apostolic succession crisis and the sacrament of order in relation to the 20th century apostasy to the church of Rome


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
La crise de la succession apostolique et le sacrement de l'ordre en relation avec l'apostasie du 20e sicle de l'glise de Rome


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
DECLARATION: On John Paul II's death


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
LA BULA DE PAULO IV


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
Pauls' IV. Bulle Cum ex apostolatus officio - Appendix


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
LA VALIDEZ CE LOS RITOS POSTCONCILIARES CUESTIONADA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS - CONTIN. 2


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
ENSEIGNEMENT DE PIE XII POUR DFENDRE LES CRITURES


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PROCLAMATION CONCILIAIRE CONCERNANT LA LIBERT RELIGIEUSE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
The second Book of accusation for heresy against the author of the new Catechism from 1992


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
The poignant Secret of Sister Lucy


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 1.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 2.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL TEMA DE LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA - BIBLIOGRAFIA


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2008
Der schmerzliche 'Ehebruch' der 'Braut Christi'


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
REPLICA AL ARTICULO 'APOSTASIA Y CONFUSION'


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
DICTAMEN SOBRE UNA ELECION PAPAL EN LAS PRESENTES CIRCUNSTANCIAS


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
ELIGENDUS EST PAPA


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
THE DIVINE MERCY


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
The Holocaust Bar is too High


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
SATIS COGNITUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Documents about the Case Williamson


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Sedevacantists Believe in the Holy Roman Catholic Church‏


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Aeterni Patris, span


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Le bon sens catholique


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Festividad de Cristo Rey


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
LEGLISE CATHOLIQUE-ROMAINE DE LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Estado de emergencia: afianzado en cemento


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2010
Im Eiltempo vom Abseits ins Aus


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 6. c. Die nach dem Kirchenrecht den Neuerern zukommende Stellung.


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 7. a-b Knnen Ppste zu Hretikern, Apostaten oder Schismatikern mutieren


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2011
Zum Beginn des neuen Jahrganges 2011


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2011
In memoriam Prof. Wendland


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
Clerical Abuse


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
E sarete come Dio (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
SOBRE LA REALIDAD Y LA EXITENCIA DEL PURGATORIO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2011
Der Wiederaufbau der Kirche als Institution


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
30 Jahre Sedisvakanz-Erklrung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Null und nichtig der Ritus der Bischofsweihe von 1968


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2015
Islamisches Recht (arīa) mit dem Grundgesetz vereinbar?(1)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2017
Die Synode von Pistoja


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2019
Nachrichten, Nachrichten, Nachrichten...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2020
Clerici vagantes oder Priester der kath. Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2020
Quo vadis?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Errors of Vatican II and their defeat through Recognizing Christ as Son of God


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
But we all beholding the glory of the Lord with open face, are transformed into the same image


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Meaning of Art in the Religious Domain


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Los errores del Vaticano II y su superacin gracias al conocimiento de Cristo como Hijo de Dios


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Cmo se puede conocer a Cristo como Hijo de Dios: nuevas consideraciones


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Queda por responder la pregunta es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Notas sobre el artculo Bienaventurados los puros de corazn porque ellos vern a Dios (Mt 5,8)


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Por eso, todos nosotros, ya sin el velo que nos cubra la cara, somos como un espejo que refleja la gloria del Seor;


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Comment le Christ peut tre reconnu comme le Fils de Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
La question demeure: Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Heureux les coeurs purs, car ils verront Dieu (Mt. 5, 8)


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Remarques sur le trait: Heureux les coeurs purs, car ils verront Dieu (Mt. 5,8)


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Limportance de lart dans le domaine religieux


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Informations de la rdaction


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Les erreurs de Vatican II


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2020
Sptes Erwachen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2021
Ankndigung


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2021
Der Geist als Seele der Kirche - deutsch und spanisch


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2022
Corona perennis Corona auf ewig?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2022
Nachrichten, Nachrichten, Nachrichten...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2023
EINSICHT, Quo vadis? (Wohin gehst du?)


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Hinweis auf die ERKLRUNG aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Erklrung aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Editors Notes


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
In Search of Lost Unity


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Note on the 2000 Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
The 2000 Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
En busca de la unidad perdida


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Nota sobre la Declaracin del ao 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Declaratin del ao 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
la recherche de unit perdue


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Rfrence la DCLARATION de lan 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Dclaration de lanne 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Erklrung aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2023
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2024
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Papa haereticus eine Antwort auf H.H. Vigan


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Leserbrief


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Aspicite nobis illusiones englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Papa haereticus englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Meine Begegnung mit S.E. Erzbischof Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
My Time with His Excellency, Archbishop Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Ma rencontre avec S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Mi encuentro con Su Excelentsimo y Reverendsimo Arzobispo Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Il mio incontro con S.E. lArcivescovo Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
EINSICHT quo vadis?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
Can the Pope Change the Rite of Holy Week?


DECLARAT ION OF MGR. M.L. GURARD DES LAURIERS
 
DECLARAT ION
OF MGR. M.L. GURARD DES LAURIERS


transl. by Gladys Resch


I am grateful to the SAKA-editor for the kindness to publish the following explanation, which are actually side-notes to a colloquium, but they concern the heart of the Church.

Having mentioned this, I have to establish the fact that for several years already Mgr. Lefbvre, despite my repeated protests, continues to bring me in connection either with R.P. Barbara as 'sedisvacantist' or with Palmar de Troya as 'schismatic'. This way Mgr. Lefbvre incites the confusion, which gives him the appearance to be right, but he evades an honnest discussion. He pretends to act this way so not to disturb the consciences. But he just confuses them greatly in questions concerning the salvation and therefore it is impossible not to protest. For the time being I contend myself to evoque the standing out points of a study, which I shall publish presently.

The Church is the living on Jesus Christ. (Jesus Christ communiqu) This communication contains two organic united aspects, which are divinely revealed. The one part, the MISSIO: ("Go, teach, baptise, educate..." - Matth. XXVIII, 18-20) "To the end of times", this means for the militant Church: the catechesis, sacraments, the leading (of souls). The other part, is the SESSIO (office holding): "You, who have followed Me shall be judges over the twelve tribes of Israel." (Matth. IXX, 28) Here is, even in the militant Church, the hierarchy installed, which manifests and realises the Catholicity.

The distinction and unity between MISSIO an SESSIO are so much part of the Church, that they are also confirmed by the Canonical Right, in general as well as in particular.

Concerning the power of consecration, the holy hierarchy consists, by divine institution, of bishops, priests, deacons; concerning the jurisdiction, it consists of the highest pontificate and the subordinate episcopate... (canon 108,3). Therefore: the holy hierarchy, the one and only one, has two fundamental conceps (rationes): the power of consecration (ratio ordinis), deriving from the MISSIO, and the power of jurisdiction (ratio jurisdictionis), deriving from the SESSIO.

If one considers the hierarchy in each particular stage, for instance the parish duties of a parish priest, there is everything that is usually to be found in the hierarchy: the duality of the aspects and the unity between the aspects. This parish priest receives from Christ, through the bishop, who "installs" him priest of this parish: order (munus) and office (officium); can. 147, 150, 151.

By the officium which creates the relation, this parish priest is assigned in Christ to the flock, to which he is (in unity with Christ, the Pope, the bishop), by reason of the power of consecration (ratione ordinis), established as shepherd; by the office (officium), this parish priest takes part in the Church in the order of mission (MISSIO), which is an integrated part of the Church.

By the order (munus), belonging to this person, this parish priest is being integrated at the same time (simultaneously with a unity of disposition), through Christ, the Pope, the bishop, into the ecclesiastical hierarchy, (ratione jurisdictione); by the order the parish priest takes part in the SESSIO, which is the integrated part of the Church.

The office is founded and measured by the mandate (munus), as the relation by its foundation. But this same analogy (of the relation) shows that the munus and the officium are really different from each other, even to such an extent that they can occasionally be apart. If, for instance, the parish priest contracts a civil marriage, his officium becomes without declaration ipso facto vacant by tacit renounciation (can.188,5). This means, that, without any canonical procedure, the parishoners may not recognise this 'civil married' priest as their parish priest. He has for himself rendered void the office to which he was installed. But he still possesses "illegally" the munus (and also the officium; can.151) until a canonical process, in which the Church judges in the name of Christ, withdraws it from him. The munus is therefore very different from the officium, as it can - under some circumstances - be separated from the officium.

The SESSIO and the MISSIO, being different from each other, but organicly linked, were at first promised (Matth. XVI,18-19) and than assigned to Peter alone (John XXI,15-19). But everything concerning the MISSIO was also assigned to the Twelve (or Ten) other Apostles, at the same time as to Peter, and in strict parity with Peter: Eucharist (Marc. XIV, 22-24); power to absolve (Matth. XVII,18; John XX,22-23). And the solemn promise: "And behold, I am with you until the end of the world" (Matth. XXVIII,20) concerns mainly the MISSIO, entrusted to the Apostles equally.

The history proves that the first Pope did not enjoy exclusively the privilege of an indulgent steadfastness: "when thou hast come back to me, it is for thee to be the support of thy brethren".(Luc. 22,32) With certaintly the mandate for the mission is founded and measured in the SESSIO; but in the militant Church, where "everything should serve to the salvation of souls"(Pius XII,3rd June,1956), the sessio exists for the MISSIO; the SESSIO alone accomplishes the unity, which, inchoatively, but in the real sense belongs already to the MISSIO, in Catholicity. This is how it must be understood for the militant Church.

At the time being, the militant Church is "occupied" and still in a state of privation. W. (mgr. K. Wojtyla), lawfully elected, (I admit this until the contrary has been proved) by a conclave consisting of about ten authentic cardinals (who have not protested), therefore occupies the Chair of Peter; he therefore ist "pope materialiter" (according to exterior legal concitions.) To those, who declare the Chair of Peter vacant, I point out that the Church is a wisely established society; physical and moral persons, who are able to declare the vacancy, have the right ipso facto to establish the "provisio" ot the authority. May P.Barbara and Mme de Boismenu convoke "a" conclave; then they will not be taken seriously anymore. Among other violations of his duties, W. supports habitually the heresy. It is obvious that W. is constantly detrimental to the "common good", which actually should be fostered by such an authority in the human community, "the militant Church". THEREFORE, IN FORCE OF THE NATURAL RIGHT, W. is metaphysically and juristically NOT able to exercise the authority. He is and cannot "formaliter" be Pope (in the true inner meaning). One does not have to obey him, because his pseudo-orders ar NULL. The Canon 118 and even less the penalty laws, being ecclesiastical laws, apply to the Pope, as they get their executive power from him. (1) (But one cans say, referring to Canon 118, that W. is, by his attitude, "ipso facto, sine ulla declaratione", deprived of the "officium"; he is deprived of the officium, which normally belongs to the Bishop of Rome, in spite of being still "illegally" in possession of the munus.) The SESSIO is therefore shaken at the top; and the shock propagates from the base to the whole building. I have kept letters written by Mgr. Lefbvre in 1976, in which he agreed to the same things in equivalent expressions.

The three positions with which we are confronted have all one thing in common: not wanting to take notice of the real distinction between matter and form in an accidental entirety, here the supreme pontificate; and they also ignore completely the analoguous character of the distinction materialiter, formaliter. Some even go as far as to pretend that there is never matter without form, mixing up the substantial entirety with the accidental entirety and the first matter with the second matter. This metaphysical ignorance leads the "Conciliars" to overlook the facts to such an extent, that they consider the mission mandate as completed; others think they have the rigth to make a Pope, and Mgr. Lefbvre is trying to unite the irreconcilables.

These facts established, let us show these points of views schematically. The first option is the one of Mgr. Lefbvre in 1983. It consists at least in the following: on the one side to affirm that the SESSIO is intact (W. is "Pope", fully, truly; "bad Pope", but "Pope"); on the other side in the recognition that the MISSIO, in its essential concerns, referring as such mainly to the pope, for instance the infallibility, is so seriously corrupted, that one cannot conform to it. (Mgr. Lefbvre holds still to the Mass).

This attitude implies - we hope unconsciously - a blasphemy against the unity and the holiness of the Church. The Church is at the same time Missio and Sessio, in an organic unity. It is impossible that a basicly corrupted "Missio" proceeds normally from an authentic Sessio. This error takes another form in the praxis of the priories: absolute silence concerning the question of the Pope; anathema to the one; who would dare to raise this question in the chapel of a priory of St. Pius X. But the "verbal" fidelity to a mannequin Pope does not confer the Catholicity to an enterprise, which muzzles the people and shows by this that it is actually a real sect, which serves the father of the lie.

The other options have at least the merit to avoid the incoherency of the Lefbvrism. They have both one view in common: to an authentic Sessio should correspond a good and even holy Missio. The Council-followers (Vatican II) are jubilant over W. and sing of a new Pentecost. They will soon end their song. The faithful, who are really attached to the Tradition, in which the instinct of the true holy faith rejects the new "Missio", similarly to the conscience contradicting evil ("murmurat malo"), these faithful reject the "W.-Sessio". There are numerous and subtile modalities. Everyone knows, at least in France, that one should not confuse the radical-Socialists with the social Radicalists. The strength lies therefore in the simplification.

As the militant Church, can only renew herself from the inside, the following question arises, due to the commotion of the Sessio: What is left from this SESSIO in the actual "official Church"? Our dear "faithful" bishops Mgr. Thuc, Mgr. Lefbvre, Mgr. de Castro Mayer... have all (!) resigned; if one wanted ot, a few things could be mentioned regarding this. It is a fact, hard and inevitable. By resigning they have accepted as authority a Montini or W., who are both affected wiht a captl schism.

Did it happen out of weariness or because they were foiled? In any case they have lost all authority and they do not take more part of the SESSIO than I (Gurard des Lauriers) and others. Of course they may sound the tocsin of their so glorious episcopal resistance. They are confined to the porch of their cathedrals like the humbly role of the famous "Quasimodo". May God listen to them! "Epheta, open yourself up" (Marc 7,34)

May God begin to sound the melody of the so well prepared text of P. De Blignires in the ears of a residing bishop, who may be unfree, old-fashioned or retarded! P. de Blignires has sufficiently considered that such a bishop, in his moral behaviour, has done nothing, which his - if also only tacit - consent to the W. Sessio would have made become sinful. There ist still hope! And in spite of this feeble ray of hope it is in no way permitted, not even under the item of a simple eventuality, to establish a pseudo-hierarchy with bishops, who do not possess the ordinary jurisdiction, even if these bishops have a certain actual jurisdiction - permodum actus - based on the mission mandate, to administer every sacrament validly to each faithful.

(In this connection Mgr. Gurard des Lauriers mentions the apprehension that there might be some attempts to establish a pseudo-hierarchy. He rejects angrily that Mgr. Lefbvre imputes to him to have something to do with it.)

He (Mgr. Lefbvre) as well as the others have an obsession concerning the Sessio. He clings to the apronstrings of a heretic... if only he "sits"... and the other, to be able to refer to someone, who "sits", It is the same error, propagated in a dangerous way by a tempting thought of security. To all this NO! The Sessio (the office holding) cannot be reestablislied in the Church by persons, who are themselves deprived of it (i.e. the Sessio). this is the safe principle, which ought to be applied at any cost. God will interverne. Concerning this, one has to wait, "in silentio et spe"... (Isaias 30,15); "let us hope against all hope" (Rom.4,18).

The obsession of the SESSIO surprises also all those, who hubly put her hope in God, who alone can restore this Sessio, in a waiting attitude without relation to the Missio. The Missio is the direct instrument for the salvation of souls. The question concerning her is simple if one wants to put it clearly. Due to the disruption of the Sessio, the Missio cannot have the Catholicity which she should have (the dreadful tragedy of the Liturgy: one should be able to say at the TE IGITUR: "una cum W...", and it is impossible to say so). Meanwhile the Missio has a proper unity; "There ist only one Body and only one Spirit ... There is only one Lord, only one faith, only one Baptism" (Eph. IV 4,5) The Missio is one because each component is one [teach, baptise, educate (in Spirit)]: dominating the diversity belonging to place and time. It is true, that this unity proper to the Missio is, without the Sessio, dubious and incomplete: in that sense that it is sometimes difficult not to stray away if the security of the infallible Magisterium is missing. "Difficult" for human beings and actually unimportant, if God makes it possible and secures it even in Himself.

The dilemna, concerning the Missio, is therefore the following:

A. EITHER to continue the Missio (Catechesis, Sacraments, education); in spite of being inevitably in a aposition of loss concerning the Catholicity, looked at in reality and objectively: and to continue the Missio, bishops are needed; these bishops can only be consecrated without reference to the Authority, which - inreality - does not exist. The consecration of these bishops is valid; it is not illicit because the canons 953 etc., like all ecclesiastical laws, have only executive power through the reigning Pope. And at the time of W. there is no Pope and there is none reigning. These bishops (I at least) submit in advance to the judgement of the Pope, if God will give a Pope to the Church while they (I) are alive.

B. OR; admit that the Missio must, at least provisionally cease, because it is practically impossible for her to be what she should be. In this perspective one could at the most practice the catechesis, which would become gradually poorer by possible infiltration of errors.

I have decided for myself the alternative A. I have no authority to impose this choice to anyone. I respect deeply and very sincerely those, who choose B ... if there are any.

But I denounce before God and before the Church the abominable scandal which is caused by the attitude of indifference and inconsequence.

You, Mgr. Lefbvre, have begun to continue the Missio. I have helped you as much as I could. But now you secure yourself and you intend to secure the poor faithful, whom you deceive, by clinging them with you to a doll, and just THIS hinders you to consecrate bishops, and this condemns you to give up the Missio, to betray - if you wanted or not - all those you have seduced. After you, nor more Missio, after you the deluge. You do YOUR work, not God's work.

And you, P. de Blignires and others, who refuse to recognise the consecrations of P. Gurard des Lauriers and others, apparently out of ecclesiastical purism, you must choose B. Close your chapel; then one will take your fears seriously. Carry on with the missio, where you are, as long as you endure it, refusing that others take care of things happening outside you, and this means in principle: doing your own work, rather than that of God.

signed M.L. Gurard des Lauriers.

***

Notes

(1) Neither Canon 118 and even less the decisions of the penal law refer as ecclesiastical laws to the Pope, as they receive their executive power from him.

Canon 1556 certifies that the purely ecclesiastical laws, (not the divine laws) do not concern the Pope: "Prima sedes a nemine judicatur"("The papal See, i.e. this Sessio, which is the principle of each Session in the militant Church cannont be judged by anyone). The Pope has to agree to the divine laws and cannot give in one jot. If he acts contrary to it, the possible occupant of the Chair of Peter can "formaliter" be no Pope.

The sentence "Prima sedes a nenime judicatur" has to be understood in this logical subdivision:

1) Major presmise: No one can be "subjected to himself", in that sense that he could be judged by himself "from the outside".
2) Minor premise: every purely ecclesiastical law gets its legal validity from the present reigning Pope.
3) Conclusion: Therefore, if the Pope would be subjected to those laws, he would judge himself. AND THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE.

Regarding the minor premise - every purely ecclesiastical law (be it "ferendae sententiae" or even "latae sententiae") gets its legal validity from the present reigning Pope - the following comment has to be brought up.

If the canonical right, concerning purely ecclesiastical laws, would be obligeing by itself, in absence of the Pope or without the will of a doubtful Pope, it would mean, that this canonical right does not find its actual legitimacy and legal force in the authority of the one, who promulgates and applies it, but in the Church. This way Peter becomes nothing but a simple servant, who has been mandated by the Church to apply the law. Such a conception is heretic, and has been explicitly and literally rejected by the Irst Vatican Council in the Constitution PASTOR AETERNUS (Chapt. 1, Denzinger-Schnmetzer 3054): "To this apparent teaching contained in Holy Scripture contradicts plainly the pernicious opinion of those, who pretend that the Primate of Peter has not been transferred immediately and directly to Peter but to the Church, and through her to him, as the servant of the Church."

The idol of a "Canonical Right from former times" has to be rejected. It is quite impossible to raise purely ecclesiastical regulations to divine laws and to condemn those, who are of another opinion. Let us remember the word of Pius XII: "The aim of the Canonical law is not to be found in itself. It is aiming at a higher end. Like every thing in the Church it serves to the salvation of souls and the apostolate. It serves to open and to even up the way to the hearts of men, the way that leads to the truth and the grace of Jesus Christ." (Pius XII. June 3rd, 1956 to professors and students at the university of Vienna).

If the letter of a canonical law, actually without legal validity, apparently forbids to continue the mission mandate (MISSIO), which is the vital element of the good, which was given to the militant Church by her Head, "the letter of the law does not oblige in conscience." (unde tales leges iniustae per contrarietatem at bonum humanum non bligant in foro conscientiae. S. thomas, summa theol. I-II q. 95 a 4) "To obey the letter of the law under such circumstances is bad; it is 'the bad thing'; the good action consists in neglecting the letter of the law and to follow what is requested for justice and the common service." ("In his ergo et similibus casibus malum est sequi legem positam; bonum autem est; praetermissis verbis legis, sequi it quod poscit justitiae ratio et communis utilitas." S. Thomas, Summa theol. II-II q l20 a, I: Is Epiky a vertu?

These principles show clearly that the consecrations of bishops by P. Gurard des Lauriers and others, which were administrated and received with the unmistakable intention to continue the Mission mandate (MISSIO and especially the oblatio pura, the pure Sacrifice) are not unlawful, even contradicting the letter of the law.

Referring to Canon 118 one can say, that W. - by his own attitude - has deprived himself of the officium (the office) "ipso facto, sine ulla declaratione". He is deprived of the officium to which normally the Bishop of Rome is entitled to, in spite of possessing the mandate (munus) in an illegitimate way.

Remark of the editor: We don't agree with all ideas of this author. As soon as possible we will try to give an answer on the question which are discussed in the article of Mgr. Gurard des Lauriers.
 
(c) 2004-2018 brainsquad.de