54. Jahrgang Nr. 4 / Juni 2024
Datenschutzerklärung | Zum Archiv | Suche




Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2004
Widerstand? - Fehl(er)anzeige!


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Dezember 2004
Notstand: einbetoniert ... oder doch: Extra Ecclesiam salus est?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Misericordias Domini in aeternum cantabo - Autobiographie von Mgr. Pierre Martin Ngô-dinh-Thuc, Erzbischof von Hué, übersetzt von Elisabeth Meurer


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2005
Öffentliche Verkündigung der DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Februar 2004
Enzyklika Mystici Corporis


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2004
Offener Brief an H.H. Bischof M. Pivaruns


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2004
Eberhard Heller: Der Fall Y. Yurchik: Aufnahme in die röm.-kath. Kirche?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2005
Zum Tode von Johannes Paul II.


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
L’ERREUR FONDAMENTALE DE VATICAN II


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ngô-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Open Letter to most Reverend Bishop M. Pivarunas


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
ROTHKRANZ Y LAS INVESTIGACIONES...


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL ERROR PRINCIPAL DEL VATICANO II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL HABITO HACE AL MONJE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
HABEMUS PAPAM?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
La libertad religiosa, error del Vaticano II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A commentary on the present situation of the Church


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Am Scheideweg


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografa de Monseor P. M. Ng-dinh-Thuc - Prologo


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Autobiografia II


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2006
Apendice II - Documentos


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
Surrexit Christus, spes mea


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat April 2003
La silla apostlica ocupada


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2003
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
Der Hauptirrtum des II. Vatikanums - Vorwort


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
ber den Papst


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
LEglise Catholique-Romaine de la diaspora


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia (esp.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A commentary on the present situation of the Church (engl.)


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2003
Warum kein islamischer Religionsunterricht


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Reflexiones sobre la fiesta de Navidad


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
The Apostolic See Occupied


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
The Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Guerard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat December 2003
Mgr. Lefebvre est-il vque ou simple lac?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juni 1971
Zur Frage der Gltigkeit der heiligen Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
Ich bin allein


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
Buchbesprechung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
Alla ricerca dellunit perduta


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mars 2002
In Search of lost unity (engl/spa)


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2002
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Der Apostolische Stuhl


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Die Weihe von P. Gurard des Lauriers zum Bischof


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
How can you be a christian without Church?


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
Le Sige apostolique < occup >


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La conscration piscopale du P. Gurard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La sede apostolica


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat December 2002
La consacrazione di P. Gurard des Lauriers a vescovo


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
LA IGLESIA CATOLICO-ROMANA EN LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
Ha permitido Roma el viejo rito misal


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
A la recherche de l'unit perdue


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2001
Christus erstand, Er, mein Hoffen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
Offener Brief an H.H. P. Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2001
SOLO LA VIEJA MISA


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
Anmerkungen zum Briefwechsel mit H.H. Pater Perez


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
VIVA EL CHRISTO REY! - STATIONEN EINER REISE DURCH MEXIKO -


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
ERKLRUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
Abri der modernen Geschichte der katholischen Kirche in Mexiko


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
SER CRISTIANO SIN IGLESIA? - UNA PONENCIA-


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
EIN NICHT UNFEHLBARER PAPST


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
VIVA CRISTO REY! -ESTACIONES DE UN VIAJE POR MJICO-


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
Religin en Mjico


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION (dt/espa)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 2001
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
Der Papst steht in der katholischen Kirche nicht zur Disposition


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
Die Weissagung


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat November 1971
SCHACHER MIT DER MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 1972
QUELLEN DER GLAUBENSLEHRE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1998
Appell an den Redakteur der EINSICHT


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1998
UNFEHLBAR UND FEHLBAR ZUGLEICH


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1998
Kirchensteuer und


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
ERKLRUNG S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April-Sondernummer 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1998
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1999
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1997
SEKTIERERTUM ALS VORGABE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1997
DIE RESTITUTION DER KIRCHE ALS RECHTSGEMEINSCHAFT


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1998
ZUM PROBLEM DER RESTITUTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1993
DER HL. ALBERTUS MAGNUS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1994
Offener Brief an Herrn Jean-Gerard Roux


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1996
VERSINKT DER KATHOLISCHE WIDERSTAND IM SEKTIERERTUM?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1995
Anhang: Die wichtigsten uerungen des Lehramtes zu Thomas von Aquin


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1995
NUR NOCH AUSLAUFMODELL?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Mrz, Doppelnr. 5-6 1996
IN MEMORIAM H.H. PFR. FRANZ MICHAEL PNIOK


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1994
Nachruf auf Herrn Jean Andr Perlant


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
La Santisima Trinidad


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1994
ber die geistliche Vollkommenheit


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1992
ARCHBISHOP NGO-DINH-THUC MARTYR FOR THE FAITH


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1992
DECLARATIO DE CONSECRATIONIBUS EPISCOPORUM


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1992
Zum Problem der gegenwrtigen Vakanz des rmischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar-Mrz 1993
Zum Problem der gegenwrtigen Vakanz des rmischen Stuhles


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1991
EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLRUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1991
ZUM TODE VON HERRN ANACLETO GONZALEZ FLORES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1991
IN ERINNERUNG AN BISCHOF MOISS CARMONA RIVERA


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
ZEHN JAHRE SEDISVAKANZERKLRUNG S.E. MGR. P. M. NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLRUNG lat/dt/engl/fr/span/ital


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
ZEUGNIS DES GLAUBENS - ZUM PROBLEM DER GEGENWRTIGEN VAKANZ DES RMISCHEN STUHLES -


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1990
WEITERE EINZELHEITEN ZUR ENTFHRUNG VON S.E. MGR. NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1990
ZUR PROBLEMATIK DER RESTITUTION DER KIRCHLICHEN HIERARCHIE


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Mrz 1989
APPELL AN SEINE MITBRDER


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai/Juni 1987
DER BRUCH FAND NICHT STATT!


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April-Sondernr 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Mrz 1988
KIRCHE OHNE RELIGION UND RELIGIONSLOSE KIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1985
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1985
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/Mrz 1986
BITTSCHREIBEN AN UNSERE BISCHFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1984
LESERBRIEFE, LESERMEINUNG...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1984
ZUR BISCHOFSWEIHE VON MGR. GNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1985
ZEIGE MIR, HERR, DEINE WEGE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2006
Wenn die Kirche nicht gttlich wre... 2. Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
Die Ereignisse der beiden letzten Jahre


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
EINIGE ANMERKUNGEN ZU DEN VON MGR. NGO-DINH-THUC UND MGR. CARMONA GESPENDETEN BISCHOFSWEIHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
DIE ANGRIFFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
ZUM PROBLEM DER BISCHOFSWEIHEN UND DER DECLARATIO VON S.E. ERZBISCHOF NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
BRIEF VON HERRN REKTOR A.D. OTTO BRAUN AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 1984
Eine Erklrung von Mgr. M.L. Gurard des Lauriers


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
BRIEF AN S.E. MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
NACHRUFE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1982
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
ERZBISCHOF PETER MARTIN NGO-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
H.H. PFARRER JOSEF LEUTENEGGER IN MNCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Oktober 1982
EINIGE ANMERKUNGEN ZU DEN ... GESPENDETEN BISCHOFSWEIHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1982
STURMWOLKEN BER DER GANZEN WELT


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
Declaration concernant Palmar


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. PIERRE MARTIN NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1981
BRIEF AN MSGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
SECTE ORTHODOXE?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
QU'EST-CE DIRE: LA NOUVELLE MESSE PEUT TRE VALIDE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1980
LETTRES


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
REPONSE DE HR L'ABBE HANS MILCH AUX QUESTIONS


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1981
QUE SIGNIFIE LA COEXISTENCE DES RITES PRE- ET POSTCONCILIAIRES


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
KANON 188, 4 DES CIC


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
Protestation de Foi Catholique - franz/deutsch


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
LO UNICO QUE QUEREMOS ES LA MlSA TRIDENTINA


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2006
Und ihr werdet sein wie Gott


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1979
BRIEF AN MGR. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1979
OFFENER BRIEF AN HERRN PROF.DR. HEINZ KREMERS


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1980
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
Konzil von Trient: Dekret ber das Sakrament der Eucharistie - ERLSUNG


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1977
DIE LITURGISCHE SPRACHE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1977
Konzil von Trient: Dekret ber das Meopfer


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1977
DIE DOGMATISCHEN BESTIMMUNGEN DES TRIDENTINUMS ZUR PRIESTERWEIHE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
EN LA ENCRUCIJADA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
la croise des chemins


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
At the crossroads


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
Y seris como Dios (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
And thou wilt be like God (Gen. 3,5)


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 1er continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
MISERICORDIAS DOMINI IN AETERNUM CANTABO, 3. continuation


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Februar 2007
APPENDICE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1976
EMPFEHLUNGEN ZUM VERHALTEN DER PRIESTER


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Oktober 1972
DIE LOGIK EINES THEOLOGEN


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1974
Papa haereticus


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Carta a Su Eminencia el obispo XXX


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Letter to His Excellency xxxx


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
LA SANTISIMA TRINIDAD


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Et vous serez comme Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaratio


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaracin


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Dclaration


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Dichiarazione


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Brief an einen Bischof...


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Fvrier 1982
COEXISTENCE PACIFIQUE?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Fvrier 1982
POUR L'AMOUR DE LA VERITE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
DE LA RESISTANCE CATHOLIQUE A L'OCCUPATION MODERNISTE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
Mgr. Lefebvre est-il vque ou simple lac?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1984
LE TEMPS DE L'APOCALYPSE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
SIEGE ET CHUTE DE LA FORTERESSE ROMAINE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat August 1984
DECLARAT ION OF MGR. M.L. GURARD DES LAURIERS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
SACRE DE M. L'ABBE GNTHER STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
MISE AU POINT DE LA SAKA SUR LE SACRE DE L'ABB G. STORCK


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktobre 1984
QUE PENSER DE LA MISE AU POINT DE M. ALPHONSE EISELE?


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
LE CAS DU PAPE HONORIUS (625-638)


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Decembre 1984
DE ECCLESIAE CAPITE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ORTHODOX SECT?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
THE APOSTOLIC CHAIR VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
ONCE MORE: PRECISE QUESTIONS TO ECNE


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
A PROCLAMATION ON 'THE NEW MASS AND THE POPE'


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Februar 1981
NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: AN ANTI-MASS, Part 2


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LE CANON 188, N 4 OU: OU EST L'EGLISE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat August 1981
LETTRE A MSGR. LEFBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
MONTRE-MOI TES CHEMINS, SEIGNEUR


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
OUR LADY OF FATIMA AND THE HOLY FATHER


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1985
DE APOSTOLICA SEDE


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
INFORMATIONS OF THE EDITOR


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
NUAGES NOIRS SUR LE MONDE ENTIER


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
THE SO-CALLED 'EXCOMMUNICATION' OF H.E. ARCHBISHOP NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
JUAN PABLO II. NO ES UN PAPA CATOLICO


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
VATICAN II FACE LA TRADITION


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
REPONSE DE M. L'ABB MILCH A LA LETTRE OUVERTE DU M. HELLER


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
FALSE BISHOPS AND TRUE BISHOPS


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
IS ONE A SCHISMATIC, WHEN IN OUR DAYS ONE CONSIDERS THE CHAIR OF ST. PETER AS VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY' OF THE SO-CALLED 'ROMAN CATHOLIC'


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
THE ARIANISM - AN EXAMPLE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE CONSENSUS FIDELIUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
MONSEOR LEFEBVRE COMO PROFETA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
LE NOVUS ORDO MISSAE: UNE ANTI-MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 1981
SEULEMENT, QUAND LE FILS DE L'HOMME REVIENDRA TROUVERA-TIL LA FOI SUR LA TERRE?


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Oktober 1981
LA BANDE DES QUATRE


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat May 1980
APPEL DU 16.4.1979


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
Vox FIDEl: LA VOIX DE LA FOl OU L'ORGANE DES SOUHAITS


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
CURRICULUM VITAE DE MGR. LOUIS VEZELIS O.F.M. (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
Some Remarks concerning the Consecrations by Mgr. Ng-dinh-Thuc and Mgr. Carmona


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
ALGUNAS CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LAS CONSAGRACIONES EPISCOPALES


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
BREVES OBSERVATIONS SUR LES SACRES EPISCOPAUX


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
THE APOSTOLIC CHAIR VACANT


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
MGR. LEFEBVRE AS PROPHET


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Decembre 1982
STORM CLOUDS OVER THE WHOLE WORLD


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
LA TRADICION


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
POUR VOUS ET POUR TOUS - LE PROGRAMME DE JEAN-PAUL II


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Decembre 1981
SECTE ORTHODOXE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
A ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP SPEAKS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
LE CAS BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE CASE BARBARA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
THE QUESTION OF THE PAPACY TODAY


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
I believe in the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
The apostolic succession crisis and the sacrament of order in relation to the 20th century apostasy to the church of Rome


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
La crise de la succession apostolique et le sacrement de l'ordre en relation avec l'apostasie du 20e sicle de l'glise de Rome


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
DECLARATION: On John Paul II's death


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
LA BULA DE PAULO IV


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
Pauls' IV. Bulle Cum ex apostolatus officio - Appendix


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
LA VALIDEZ CE LOS RITOS POSTCONCILIARES CUESTIONADA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS - CONTIN. 2


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
ENSEIGNEMENT DE PIE XII POUR DFENDRE LES CRITURES


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
PROCLAMATION CONCILIAIRE CONCERNANT LA LIBERT RELIGIEUSE


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
The second Book of accusation for heresy against the author of the new Catechism from 1992


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
The poignant Secret of Sister Lucy


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 1.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL PROBLEMA DE LA RESTITUCION DE LA JERARQUIA CAT. 2.Cont


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
EL TEMA DE LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Mai 2008
LA RESTAURACION DE LA JERARQUIA CATOLICA - BIBLIOGRAFIA


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2008
Der schmerzliche 'Ehebruch' der 'Braut Christi'


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
REPLICA AL ARTICULO 'APOSTASIA Y CONFUSION'


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
DICTAMEN SOBRE UNA ELECION PAPAL EN LAS PRESENTES CIRCUNSTANCIAS


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
ELIGENDUS EST PAPA


Ausgabe Nr. 15 Monat Juli 2008
THE DIVINE MERCY


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
The Holocaust Bar is too High


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
SATIS COGNITUM


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Documents about the Case Williamson


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
Sedevacantists Believe in the Holy Roman Catholic Church‏


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Aeterni Patris, span


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat September 2009
Le bon sens catholique


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Festividad de Cristo Rey


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
LEGLISE CATHOLIQUE-ROMAINE DE LA DIASPORA


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Estado de emergencia: afianzado en cemento


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2010
Im Eiltempo vom Abseits ins Aus


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 6. c. Die nach dem Kirchenrecht den Neuerern zukommende Stellung.


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 7. a-b Knnen Ppste zu Hretikern, Apostaten oder Schismatikern mutieren


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2011
Zum Beginn des neuen Jahrganges 2011


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2011
In memoriam Prof. Wendland


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
Clerical Abuse


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
E sarete come Dio (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
SOBRE LA REALIDAD Y LA EXITENCIA DEL PURGATORIO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2011
Der Wiederaufbau der Kirche als Institution


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
30 Jahre Sedisvakanz-Erklrung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Null und nichtig der Ritus der Bischofsweihe von 1968


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2015
Islamisches Recht (arīa) mit dem Grundgesetz vereinbar?(1)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2017
Die Synode von Pistoja


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2019
Nachrichten, Nachrichten, Nachrichten...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2020
Clerici vagantes oder Priester der kath. Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2020
Quo vadis?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Errors of Vatican II and their defeat through Recognizing Christ as Son of God


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
But we all beholding the glory of the Lord with open face, are transformed into the same image


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Meaning of Art in the Religious Domain


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Los errores del Vaticano II y su superacin gracias al conocimiento de Cristo como Hijo de Dios


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Cmo se puede conocer a Cristo como Hijo de Dios: nuevas consideraciones


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Queda por responder la pregunta es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Notas sobre el artculo Bienaventurados los puros de corazn porque ellos vern a Dios (Mt 5,8)


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Por eso, todos nosotros, ya sin el velo que nos cubra la cara, somos como un espejo que refleja la gloria del Seor;


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Comment le Christ peut tre reconnu comme le Fils de Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
La question demeure: Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Heureux les coeurs purs, car ils verront Dieu (Mt. 5, 8)


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Remarques sur le trait: Heureux les coeurs purs, car ils verront Dieu (Mt. 5,8)


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Limportance de lart dans le domaine religieux


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Informations de la rdaction


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Les erreurs de Vatican II


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2020
Sptes Erwachen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2021
Ankndigung


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2021
Der Geist als Seele der Kirche - deutsch und spanisch


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2022
Corona perennis Corona auf ewig?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2022
Nachrichten, Nachrichten, Nachrichten...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2023
EINSICHT, Quo vadis? (Wohin gehst du?)


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Hinweis auf die ERKLRUNG aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat August 2023
Erklrung aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Editors Notes


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
In Search of Lost Unity


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Note on the 2000 Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
The 2000 Declaration


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
En busca de la unidad perdida


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Nota sobre la Declaracin del ao 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Declaratin del ao 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
la recherche de unit perdue


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Rfrence la DCLARATION de lan 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Dclaration de lanne 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Einheit


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2023
Erklrung aus dem Jahr 2000


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2023
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Januar 2024
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Papa haereticus eine Antwort auf H.H. Vigan


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Leserbrief


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Aspicite nobis illusiones englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2024
Papa haereticus englisch


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Meine Begegnung mit S.E. Erzbischof Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
My Time with His Excellency, Archbishop Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Ma rencontre avec S.E. Mgr. Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Mi encuentro con Su Excelentsimo y Reverendsimo Arzobispo Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
Il mio incontro con S.E. lArcivescovo Pierre Martin Ng-dinh-Thuc


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mrz 2024
DECLARATIO


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
EINSICHT quo vadis?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2024
Can the Pope Change the Rite of Holy Week?


IS ONE A SCHISMATIC, WHEN IN OUR DAYS ONE CONSIDERS THE CHAIR OF ST. PETER AS VACANT
 
IS ONE A SCHISMATIC, WHEN IN OUR DAYS ONE CONSIDERS
THE CHAIR OF ST. PETER AS VACANT,
AND THE COUNCIL-POPES AS PRETENTION-POPES?


by
Rev. Father August Gross
(transl. by Gladys Resch; already printed in KYRIE ELEISON March / April 1983, pg. 2 ff)

The answers concerning the Council and the reforms after the Council, especially those concerned with the Liturgy, differ a lot. I am not concerned with those, who have enthusiastically accepted everything. It rather matters about discussions amongst those, who are recognised outwardly as holding on to the holy Roman Catholic Mass, and who refuse to use the N.O.M.

Amongst those the legitimacy of the Council- and Reform-Popes is vehemently discussed. The question is: are they, or are they not really Popes.

This dispute came to a head, when on November 8th, 1979, the Right Reverend Archbishop Lefbvre put the compulsory demand to the members of his Fraternity to hold on to the legitimacy of these Popes under the cost of loosing the membership of the Fraternity. In fact, as everyone knows, several priests had to leave it for this reason.

The reasoning of Mgr. Lefbvre is that it is being schismatic to accept the Chair of St. Peter as being vacant. (Vacation of the Papal See.)

This is his argument: "The sequence of ideas of those, who maintain that there is no Pope, would lead the Church into a hopeless situation." "This spirit is a schismatic spirit."

In front of me lies a photostat of a letter with a letterhead of the Fraternity in Germany. Preceding the signature is "i.A.": therefore, it seems to be an 'officious' comment, concerning an answer to a lay person, according to the official line of the Fraternity. There I read: "John Paul II is without doubt to be recognised as Pope by every Catholic, as long as there is no official judgement put against him. Our Fraternity insists emphatically on this simple truth against all theologically uneducated and half-educated fanatics and sectarians.

I beg you not to be disturbed in spite of the many groups which have been formed lately. We just hold firm to our holy faith and the traditional Liturgy and can be certain to contribute to the rehabilitation of holy Church." (NN, 4th July, 1982)

To contribute to the rehabilitation of the holy Church has also been the intention of other groups, existing prior to the appearence of the Fraternity in Germany. And they too are convinced that their intention is not only in a 'good' but also in an invincible 'erroneous' faith. With this I mean to say: The good intention and subjective certainty is not a theologically understandible argument.

According to this opinion of the Fraternity, the former sacristan of Herne tries, since several years, to 'draw away' the faithful, who attend Mass there, with the argument, that there they attend a Mass of schismatics. Notice: I do not claim that he has been commissioned by the Fraternity. But this will have to happen when the opinion of the schismatic mentality and the fact move the very "eager" Sedisvacantists. And perhaps it is not an exaggeration to mention that it is 'rather' unfriendly and unkind to call them theologically uneducated or half educated fanatics and sectarians.

Truly, it is about time to make some theological remarks concerning the argument regarding the Reform-Popes. This certainly must be allowed. Unless there exists in the opinion of the Archbishop a decision of the 'infaillible Magisterium'. But this can certainly not be his opinion or that of the Fraternity.

Even the respect due to him as bishop is not a hindrance to it; there have been many erring bishops. The fame too of having as sole bishop rejected the Council and the 'Liturgical Reform' for the sake of the true faith, does not forbid to have a different opinion concerning the Popes to-day. - On the contrary, as will be proved. - Even the fact, that he is a friendly and kind person does not prove the correctness of his view concerning the Pope. Where the bishop sees the faith endangered, he is of great severity, as he has proved actually in the case of Paul VI and now towards the Sedisvacantists.

Concerning the true faith, I am of the same severity and shall not even make the impression of a suggested compromise; not regarding the Council, its Popes and bishops or anyone.

As a matter of fact it concerns the right faith, and in this case the papacy. The sources of which I cite Mgr. Lefbvre are: "Mitteilungsblatt der Priesterbruderschaft" (text: "MB") No. 15 and 45; "Satans Meisterstck (text: "SM") Ed. Saint-Gabriel, Martigny 1978; teaching documents of the Church by Denzinger-Schnmetzer, Herder, Freiburg 1965, and Neuner-Roos, Pustet, Regensburg 1975.

Mgr. himself produces theological arguments for his opinion, as mentioned above: "The train of thoughts of those, who claim that there exists no Pope at present, would lead the Church into a hopeless situation." "All this should incite us to pray and to keep up bravely the Tradition, but without letting ourselves, at the same time, be tempted to pretend that the Pope is no Pope." "This spirit" of those, who claim that there is no Pope at present, "is a schismatic spirit". (MB 15, pg. 6)

What is meant by a "schismatic spirit" and who is a "schismatic"? "Sectarians" are of course to a great extend schismatics and at the same time heretics! - The code of the Church declares: "If a baptised person - who retains the name of Christ - denies or doubts persistently one of the truths to be believed in God and the Catholic faith, he (she) is a heretic; if he (she) abandons totally the christian faith, he is an apostate (This is not meant in the modern, indifferentist meaning as it is used, since the Council in the 'Catholic Church' taken over by the heretics. No one would ever have imagined at the time of the codification if the Canon Law, that this meaning of the word would ever become commun in the speach of Popes, bishops and many people.)

If one finally refuses (the expression "persistently" - above - still being valid) to submit to the highest Pontifex or refuses to have community with those, who submit to him, one is a schismatic". (CIC, can. 1325 2) Ludwig Ott explains this in "Outline of the Catholic Dogmatics" as follows:

1) Unity of faith.

It consists in that all members of the Church stand inwardly firm to the submitted truths of faith, at least inclusively, and professes them openly - (unity of creed ...).

2) Unity of community.

It consists on one side in the submission of the members of the Church under the authority of the bishops and the Pope - (unity of government or hierarchical unity) on the other side in the connection of the members among themselves, forming a social unity by taking part in the same cult and in the same means of grace (unity of cult or liturgical unity).

The unity of faith as well as that of community is garanteed in the safest way by the primacy of the Pope, the highest teacher and shepherd of the Church. The unity of faith is being destroyed by the heresy, the unity of community by schism (a.a.O., pg. 35 etc). To avoid misunderstanding one has to add, that Ott understands it this way: For the heretics or schismatics their unity with the Church is destroyed accordingly, not the unity of the Church in hereself; because, then she would be destroyed in hereself and at all, what is impossible according to the affirmation of Christ: "The gates of hell will not prevail against it."

Now then: If Paul VI and John Paul II are truly Popes, the Sedisvacantists are naturally schismatics and even heretics. They would have given up the unity of the Creed, the government and the cult of the Church. This applies not less to Mgr. Lefbvre. He too refuses to accept the Council in its teaching of ecumenism, collegialism and the freedom of faith and the reform of the Liturgy. The essential difference consists in that then the Sedisvacantists are 'objectively' schismatics, but not 'subjectively'. They refuse to offer those men the divine and ecclesiastical demanded obedience in faith, cult or government, because according to the true faith, they can only give it to those men, who are truly Popes. Or in the reverse case: the true faith in Jesus Christ, who does not change His teaching in the course of time, or let it be changed in the Church, includes for them the necessity to refuse the legitimacy of the Council-Popes.

As opposed to this Mgr. L. emphasizes since November 8th, 1979 that Paul VI and John Paul II are Popes. With this he breakes subjectively the unity of faith, cult and government with these Popes and the true Church. Because, where the Pope is, there is the Church. Who then has a "schismatic spirit"?

There is not enough space here to enter into the reason what could have brought Mgr. L. to persistently hold on to the idea that we have nowadays legitimate Popes. - This will have to be explained in a wider study, in which all arguments and questions will find their answer.

Mgr. L. tries to avoid the theological logical consistency of the above train of thoughts by a certain theory, "which is more complex, but also more realistic: it is the theory of a Paul VI, who is to a very great extent, a liberal". (SM, pg. 44) Not to understand this theory, proves one to be theologically uneducated or half educated and to be on one's mercy of the sectarian's fanaticism.

On this theory Mgr. L. means to settle the refusal and recognition of the Popes. The refusal: "St. Peter himself is the one, who - as follower of Peter (as Pope; notice of the translator) condemns... what is being demanded by the present Pope." (SM, pg. 18); "because it is impossible that Popes don't teach the same doctrine; it is impossible that the Popes revocate each other that they contradict each other." (ibid, pg. 11) "Jesus Christ cannot be divided. One cannot say: one obeys Jesus Christ of to-day, but not Jesus Christ of yesterday". (ibid, pg. 10) "One cannot possibly be outside the truth, when one continues what had been done for 2000 years, when one does not cease to believe what had been believed for 2000 years. This is absolutely impossible". (ibid, pg. 16 f.); "because the liberal and modernistic church, which is occupying the true, to silence forced Church, has no right to demand obedience, but rather have we to resist, because her orders and tendencies are not those of the Catholic Church. They destroy the Church. We may not co-operate with the destruction of the Church; we do not want to become Protestants." (ibid, pg. 28) "To retain the faith and the means which have sanctified souls and the Church for 2000 years ... is a criterion of the attachement to the Church ... Incidentally, it is just this criterion which decides also on the legitimacy of the succession of the See of Peter and the bishoprics". (ibid, pg. 29)

Is there any true Catholic, who will not agree with all this? That's why the Catholics were so relieved and happy when finally a bishop too agreed to the things they knew already, or - others - to the things they found out through him. The Sedisvacantists too agree with this. And would it not be the appropriate consequence to recognise that Paul VI was not truly a Pope? Often enough Mgr. L. says: "It is impossible that..."

But it is somehow different for Mgr. L. Already on February 27th, 1977 he gives it another interpretation: "Which attitude should we have towards Pope Paul VI? This attitude will differ according to how one defines Pope Paul VI; because our attitude towards the Pope as Pope and follower of Peter cannot change. Therefore the true question is: Was Pope Paul VI ever or is he still follower of St. Peter? If the answer is in the negative - Paul VI was never Pope, or is it not anymore - we must consider ourselves to be in a period of sedisvacancy, which would simplify the problem. This is being claimed by some theologians, by referring to Church-agreed declarations of previous theologians, who have thoroughly examined this problem of a heretic and schismatic Pope... It is not to be ruled that this hypothesis will one day be confirmed by the Church; because it has certain arguments on its side." (SM, pg. 43)

(Meanwhile Mgr. L. is convinced of the fact that this cannot be right anymore, but reveals a schismatic spirit.)

Mgr. L. also mentions as second hypothesis the possibility of Paul VI kept in custody and put under drugs, which he rejects as unacceptable. Mgr. L. continues: "Is there not more complex but also more realistic answer between the two hypothesis of a heretic Pope, who as such is no Pope anymore, and a Pope, who does not carry any responsibility, because he is being hindered to accomplish his office by the tyranny of his environment? It could be the answer of a Paul VI, who, to a high degree, is a liberal. The roots of his liberalism lead to Luther, Jean-Jaques Rousseau, Lamenais, but also to those he has known personally: Mare Sangnier, Fogazzaro, the 'bad Maritain', Teilhard de Chardin, La Pira etc." (SM, pg. 44)

"In this case our conclusion is as follows: we are with Pope Paul VI as follower of St. Peter, if he accomplishes his duties as follower of St. Peter; but we refuse to follow Pope Paul VI as follower of Luther, Rousseau, Lamenais etc. The official and permanent ministry of the Church makes it clear to us if Pope Paul acts one way or the other. We therefore consider all his endeavours, acts and punishments as null, which are supposed to oblige us to follow Paul VI as liberal and destroyer of our faith; but we accept all acts which are helpful to support our Catholic faith. If it should prove a contradiction to the promises of Our Lord Jesus Christ, that a Pope is basically liberal, one would have to follow the first hypothesis. But this does not seem evident." (SM, pg. 45 f.)

All this was primarily put as "Answer to several actual questions" to the Seminarians and later published offically in SM. A little more than six months later, he said in a sermon in Poitiers: "We obey all Popes of yesterday, therefore we also obey those of today"; "as we are faithful to all Popes and all Councils of yesterday, we are convinced to be faithful also to the Pope and the Council of today... As, once more: 'Jesus Christus heri, hodie et in saecula". (SM, pg. 11) Referring to the hypothesis of a liberal Pope, these strange sentences become understandible. This explains his saying: "But are we obliged to accept the errors because they come to us from the authority? Not more than we would have to obey parents who are blameworthy and demand of us to act as they do." (MB 45, pg. 10) This brings immediately 'a light' to most listeners. This is how the Apostles talked before the Council, which wanted to forbid them to proclaim Jesus as the Messias, and Son of God. (Acts 5,29)

But all this is terribly wrong. The Apostles contradicted the Council, which had no religious authority anymore: the old Covenant and its authorities no more existed. The veil of the Holiest was torn at the death of Jesus.

The authority of parents, educators, the government also comes from God, "of Whom every authority (paternitas, fatherhood) receives its name (which stands for the "essence", the "nature") (Eph. 3,15) But God has not given them the infaillibility for the practice of their authority.

Here we see that Mgr. Lefbvre has put the wrong question. Instaed of asking for the "definition" of Paul VI (see above), he should have asked for the definition of the Pope's office. Then he would have realised that "the promise of Our Lord Jesus Christ" would be incompatible with a "liberal Pope". Because Jesus Christ has promised the following to Simon, the son of Jonas: Whatever you will bind one arth, will be bound in heaven. (Et quodcumque ligaveris) - Whatever you will loosen on earth, will also be loosened in heaven. (Et quodcumque solveris). This is Jesus Christ' definition of the Pope, such is the kind of power of administration of the one, who possesses the "keys of heaven". By this he is the "rock", on which the Church stands securely and invincible. (compare Mt. 7,24-27)

The Archbishop L. says rightly: "One cannot divide Jesus Christ." (SM, pg. 10) That should mean in one (Jesus Christ) Who, in His own life on earth and in all centuries of the Church teaches this through the Popes and Councils, and then, in our times teaches something opposite through the Popes and the Council. Can He contradict Himself in the same Pope? But it is also not possible to 'divide' a Pope as individual, as one whose acts in office are partly obliging and partly not obliging. Our Lord did not say: Some of the things you are binding will also be bound in heaven - which people will be able, through the official and permanent teaching of the Church, to decide for themselves, under the leadership of a bishop, whom I shall provide. - What is really permanent, is the strength of the previous decisions of the Church's ministry. Every ordinary faithful should know them to that extent, that he recognises the contradictions between the old true doctrine and the new one. Further, Our Lord did not say: some of what you are binding will not be bound in Heaven. It is not necessary to mention that the teaching of the Church concerning the Papacy is not different:

"We therefore teach and express: The Roman Church possesses, according to the instruction of the Lord, the priority of the orderly power over all other churches. (Here too we have to notice, that again the nowdays unfortunately used 'ecumenical language' is not meant. By "churches" we understand what could be called church-provinces.) This power of competence of the Roman Bishop, which really has episcopal character, is immediate. To this power shepherds and faithful of every rite and rang, separately as well as in their entity, are bound in duty to hierarchical submission and true obedience, not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in order and government to the Church, extended over the whole world. Thus keeping this unit with the Roman Bishop in the community and in profession of the same faith, the Church of Christ is one flock under one supreme shepherd. This is the teaching of the Catholic truth of which nobody can deviate without endangering his faith and his salvation (Vatican Council 1869/70, 4th session, 3rd Chapt.; D-S No. 445) "Therefore, who ever says that the Roman Bishop has only the office of supervision or administration and not the whole and supreme power of competence over the whole Church, - and actually not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in what concerns the order and government of the Church extended over the whole world -; or, who says, that he has only a larger part but not the fullness of this supreme power, or that this, his power, is not orderly and immediate over the total as well as the single Churches, as over (all) and the single shepherds and faithful, should be anathema." (Vat. Council, DS 3064)

One has to believe Mgr. Lefbvre when he says that he is only concerned about the true faith and the salvation of souls, that he is not acting in a schismatic mentality. Obviously he has 'good faith' when he says: "As we are faithful to all Popes and Councils of yesterday..." Unfortunately he is deceiving himself and also his followers. All Popes and Councils mentioning the papacy teach unanismously: absolute obedience is due to the Pope.

It is really tragic. Just for the sake of having a Pope today, he invents a 'sort' of Pope, who does not exist in the revelation. He destroys the true conception of faith concerning the Office of a Pope; it is not true that it is the office of the rock because a, as legitimate Pope, accepted man, "leads since 15 years the presidency for the destruction of the Church"; therefore it is not true that his 'binding' and 'loosening' are a binding and loosening by God, because it is natural that one cannot follow an order of the supreme head to "dissolve" and "destroy" the Church. That is how the Papal office is being annihilated, accepting Paul VI (and John Paul II) as "legitimate" Pope. What remains is a figurehead. We are supposed to recognise a 'deputy Pope' for the infaillible true preaching of the Gospel and the Church discipline. But we are not prepared to accept this.

Jesus Christ said, that the authority of heaven guarantees all actions of Office of Peter and his followers. As He does not lie and also possesses the almightiness to keep His promise, the one - who is claiming to have the papal authority and "wants to destroy the Church" and intends to bring to power a "modernistic church", which is occupying the true, "silent made Church" - can unquestionably not be a real Pope. If he had taught a new doctrine, contradicting the old real one, pretending 'only' according to the ordinary ministry - but Mgr. L. knows by experience that one still insists on total submission - if he had also 'defined' it or somehow 'held out' (pertinaciter, CIC a.a.O.) and made known as his strong convinced 'faith' and retaining the name of Christian - even the name of 'Father' of all Christians - such a man in the robes of a Pope is a heretic, and as such in any case incapable to officiate. In reality the petition of the Our Father "Your Will be done on earth as it is in Heaven" finds its fulfilment in the papacy. The papacy is the 'navel string' by which the visible Church on earth is connected with God and receives her life to grow to the "fullnesse of Christ" in the "Magnificence of the Father". The Sedisvacantists are far away from having a "schismatic spirit" and to be "theologically uneducated or half educated fanatics and sectarian."

- If Paul VI had been a true, real Pope, all complaints against his Council and his reform would only be based on imaginations.

- If Paul VI and John Paul II are considered true Popes, one has to obey them, as one has to obey God.

It follows from the true Catholic doctrine, concerning the papacy: The resistance to a man, who seems to have the right to claim papal authority, is not a real but only an apparent disobedience if this man is not a real but an apparent Pope. Who ever considers such a long sedisvacancy impossible, because to his opinion "the Church would be lead into a hopless situation" (MB 15, pg. 6) should remember the situation in which Jesus said to Peter:

"Man of little faith, why have you doubted?" (Mt. 14,31)
 
(c) 2004-2018 brainsquad.de